Talk:Biblioscape

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-12-01. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Other entry like http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/ProCite also has one line. I have not seen the page that was first created for this entry. I do not know why it was deleted. Is there a way to see it?

ProCite is developed by Thomson Corporation, which has an article on Wikipedia and seems to be a fairly large company, unlike the developer of this program. This product seems non-notable and therefore seems like advertising (although I think the proper tag should have been notability, not blatant advertising). Tucker001 (talk | contribs) 04:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google ranks the home page of a web site. If you have google toolbar, it will be displayed on the toolbar. If you do a google search of Biblioscape, it has 2.5 million hits. If you go to "More | Books", Biblioscape has been mentioned in 27 books. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xiannong (talk • contribs) 16:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then put some of this information into the article. I'm not trying to be mean here; we insist on information from impartial third-party sources to verify notability and detailed claims. "It's on google" does not constitute proper sourcing of information. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biblioscape. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030000135/http://www.researchinformation.info:80/rispring03review_notabene_biblioscape.html to http://www.researchinformation.info/rispring03review_notabene_biblioscape.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]