Talk:Bentall Centre (Vancouver)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance).

Bentall 5

The building has no 13th floor. The top floor will be numbered 34, but it will still only be 33 storeys tall. -- Usgnus 03:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC) From the Development Permit Report: "THAT the Board APPROVE Development Application No. 405804 as submitted, the plans and information forming a part thereof, thereby permitting the construction of the top 11 storeys of a 33-storey office tower, a 2-storey, Class 1 restaurant (pavilion) building, and a permanent plaza, subject to the following conditions:" -- Usgnus 03:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Construction accident

The detailed description of the construction accident should be moved out of the introduction of the description and moved to an Historical Events sub-section. A short sentence in the intro would be sufficient. Also there are no citations in the section.— Preceding unsigned comment added by NickScalan (talk • contribs) 19:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bentall Centre, Vancouver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140313001242/http://www.bentallcentre.com/CMS/MediaFree/file/Retail%20Phone%20List%20Jan%202014.pdf to http://www.bentallcentre.com/CMS/MediaFree/file/Retail%20Phone%20List%20Jan%202014.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bentall name?

Hi, could someone write something about the history of why the Bentall name is used? Thanks! Skippingrock (talk) 02:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't currently have sources, so won't be adding this to the article, but just for interest's sake i can tell you that the family which started/owned/ran it was a branch of the family which founded & owned Bentalls in London; happy days, Lindsay^Hello 14:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Bentall 5

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge. ELEKHH^T 13:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article at Bentall 5 could be merged here, it's only a couple sentences long and doesn't seem to be overly notable. 162 etc. (talk) 05:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would say you're probably right. What Bentall 5 does have is a number of pictures; we'd probably need to pick and choose what's brought over, in order not to overwhelm Bentall Centre. Happy days ~ Lindsay^Hello 12:59, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Unmerge Bentall 5 from Bentall Centre

As a Bentall (BGO) employee I'd like to confirm the B5 (incorrectly known as Bentall 5 or Five Bentall Centre) is not a part of the Bentall Centre, which is comprised of only Bentall Centre one through four. Bentall Centre is only those four buildings which are connected to each other underground. B5 is a separate development and should have its own article. Could someone maybe also add the BentallGreenOak - the developer of the Bentall Centre, the B5 and the B6 - will also be a tenant of the B5 as of October 2023? BentallGreenOakPM (talk) 00:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]