Talk:Bed Chem/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 18:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Locust member (talk · contribs) 16:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

This article looks like it is in beautiful shape so I'll be taking this on :) Will try to get this done by the weekend. Locust member (talk) 16:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Broad

• Covers the major aspects of a standard song article and does not veer off topic. Y

NPOV

• Y

Stable

• No edit disputes within the past 14 days. Slight vandalism from an anonymous editor a few days ago but nothing that seems persistent. Y

Illustrated

• Images are correctly licensed and have ALT text. Y
• Sound sample is correctly licensed and relevant, complies with WP:SAMPLE. Y