This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
This article is part of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the Eastern Orthodox Church. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You may also want to look at the current collaboration of the month or the project's notice board.Eastern OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Eastern OrthodoxyEastern Orthodoxy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus. There is little evidence of what formal name is used for each monastery. In some cases editors on opposite sides appear to agree about the factual situation (e.g. Nyttend and No Such User). Yet Nyttend argues that the lack of data should cause us to go ahead with 'Foo Monastery' while No Such User wants to leave the titles alone and use WP:MOSCAPS as advice to be conservative. For this set of articles, with the existing knowledge (or lack thereof) of the real names of the monasteries it is hard to go forward with capitalization. This problem is not confined to Serbian monasteries. As In ictu oculi observes, we do not refer to St Andrew's Church, Wanborough as Wanborough Church. EdJohnston (talk) 01:30, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[And 34 others similar listed below.], asked for as uncontroversial "(M) capitalization" by Relisted for further input. Jafeluv (talk) 06:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC) Zoupan at 16:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment—I believe these should not proceed. As WP:MOSCAPS says, "Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalisation". Chicago MOS and Oxford's New Hart's are similar. Compare US administration, Australian government, Hubble's law. Tony(talk) 03:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. English capitalization is different from other languages. There are not a lot of English articles about these monasteries, this one[1] uses a capital M. In the native language, Romanian, Bazjaš monastery does not capitalize M here.[2] Looking at Category:Christian monastery stubs, most of these capitalize the M, or A, in Monastery and Abbey. Apteva (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The proposed article titles may be correct if they were actually names in English (e.g. as in Westminster Abbey), but it is not appropriate for us to create such when these institutions are hardly known in English. The fact that capitalisation is used incorrectly in some other references or other places in Wikipedia does not make it correct here. Examples of the correct usage are numerous - e.g. most rail stations where the words 'rail station' are not part of the name, e.g. Broad Green railway station. Imc (talk) 21:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Even in Serbian, where the attributive precedes the head noun, it is unclear if manastir 'monastery' is part of the proper name or just an attributive. For example, the last sentence of [3] spells manastir Studenica. At least, there is a mixed bag: some monasteries are named after the nearby village (or vice versa, doesn't matter) (so it's tentatively Kovilj Monastery -- the Monastery of Kovilj), and some are not (Manasija monastery -- monastery named "Manasija" ), but it is way too subtle, and it's hard to tell one from another. So, since it is unclear if there is a 'correct' capitalization, I'd prefer to go on WP:MOSCAPS, and leave the titles alone. No such user (talk) 07:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Still, in that case the majority is moved to "X Monastery", besides Manasija, Mileševa, Hajdučica, Pokajnica, Studenica etc. Upon agreement, we could change the requests for these. I would even omit "monastery" from the latter examples as per primary topic.--Zoupan17:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Despite claims to the contrary, these clearly are proper names and in English all elements of proper names are capitalised. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, except any for which we have clear evidence that it has some other name, e.g. "Foo monastery" because it's St. Elijah's Monastery in the town of Foo. For monasteries named "Foo" and not named something like "St. Elijah's", English usage says that the second word is a proper noun and should be capitalised. Let's move all of them and fix the St. Elijah-type monasteries individually later. Nyttend (talk) 03:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
