Talk:Battle of the Frogs

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of the Frogs article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Battle of the Frogs has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 17, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Amphibians and Reptiles Mid‑importance

	Battle of the Frogs is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Connecticut Mid‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Folklore Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States History Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

A fact from Battle of the Frogs appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 July 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 1754 Battle of the Frogs was commemorated on banknotes (detail pictured)?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of the Frogs.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 02:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Detail from banknote

... that the 1754 Battle of the Frogs was commemorated on banknotes (detail pictured)?

Source: The frog vignette appears on the $1, $2, $3, $5 and $10 notes in the lower right corner. The old notes reminded everyone that touched them about the then-famous battle of the frogs...

Piano score for the Frog Chorus

- ALT1: ... that an opera based on the Battle of the Frogs (piano score pictured) was compared to the fictional musical Springtime for Hitler? Source: Mr. Brouillard said that the operetta's story line is on the order of Springtime for Hitler, the musical in the Mel Brooks film, The Producers, that is so bad it is funny and becomes a Broadway hit.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Barbara's Rhubarb Bar

Improved to Good Article status by Gobonobo (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 120 past nominations.

gobonobo ⁺ ^c 16:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article was nominated for DYK within 7 days of reaching Good Article status. Article is over 1,500 words in prose and is well-sourced. Earwig picked up a copyright violation of 44.8% with "violation possible" as a status, but most of the detected violations were just the phrase "Battle of the Frogs" or quotes that were already properly cited. AGF on print sources. ALT0 is a good hook and the image associated is great. Image has no copyright violations as it is public domain. lullabying (talk) 06:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lullabying and Gobonobo: I went to confirm the hook {citation 10) and there is no page number - it was on page 4. Some other sources also have no page numbers. For accuracy can you add the correct page numbers to sources? If it is a matter of multiple pages you could use a system like this {{r|Weaver|p=4}}. I think it is a source=to=text integrity issue per WP:DYKCITE. Lightburst (talk) 00:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightburst: Thank you for catching that. I've added an inline ref for that sentence from the Paper Money source, which goes into more detail. I've also added page numbers where I could. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 17:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Note to the promoting administrator that earwig is not working for me. Lightburst (talk) 02:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Number of frog statues

How many statues of frogs are there at the bridge?

Early in the article, we read, ‘known as the "Frog Bridge" for the four enormous copper frogs that perch at each corner.’ Most likely, “each end” is meant, and that would give eight. I myself think of bridges’ having indeed four corners, i.e., two at each end, as in a phrase such as “the SW corner of the bridge.” That would give sixteen, but I am no pontifex.

Later in the article, we read, “The bridge….features four 11-foot (3.4 m) tall copper frogs atop giant concrete spools on either side of the bridge.” Does that give eight again?

Retracting slightly my remark about pontifex, I build the bridge in my imagination with four frogs in total.

Thanks to the people who produced the article. Entertaining.

Walter Turner 217.252.138.207 (talk) 16:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@217.252.138.207: Nor a pontifex am I. It should be four frogs, total. Manny, Willy, Windy and Swifty. I've adjusted the wording, hopefully lifting that fog of uncertainty. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 05:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]