Jump to content

Talk:Barbara Olshansky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One sentence on the actual subject?

[edit]

This article contains only one biographical sentence about the subject "Barbara Olshansky is an American human rights lawyer." and that claim isnt even backed by a citation. Bonewah (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted a {{coatrack}} placed on this article -- the justification above is clearly incorrect. The books someone wrote, and where they work is clearly biographical material.
  • Olshansky is author with Dave Lindorff of The Case for Impeachment: The Legal Argument for Removing President George W. Bush from Office.
  • After leaving the Center for Constitutional Rights Olshansky was hired as director of the International Justice Network.
  • In 2007 Olshanksy was appointed the Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor in Human Rights at Stanford University's Law School.
Every single reference in the article confirms she is a human rights lawyer. I have to wonder how much effort the tag placer put into reading the article prior to their tag placement. Geo Swan (talk) 21:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this article is a biography of Barbara Olshansky then it should contain biographical information about her such as birth, job, family, and indications of her noteworthiness. As it stands, the article contains one unsourced line about her then a whole paragraph about her book, as if the intention of the article is to discuss the book, not the author.
If the subject of this article is truly notable, then her bio should contain links to her Pulitzer Prize or other third-party accolades she might have earned. Simply being an author is not enough to warrant inclusion in wikipedia, nor is being a human rights lawyer.
As to the Matthew Diaz leak, its covered in detail in Diaz' own page, and is better suited for an article on gitmo detainees, rather than her. Additionally, WP:BLP1E advises "Where a person is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about a larger subject, but essentially remains a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having an article on them." Finally, wp:coatrack says "In some cases where an event in a person's life is the only notable thing about them, it may make sense to only have an article on the event and not have an article on the person at all." which, in this case means that this article should either be expanded to a real biography or deleted as a coatrack. Bonewah (talk) 21:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Barbara Olshansky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barbara Olshansky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]