Talk:Barbara Amiel

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hertfordshire (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HertfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HertfordshireTemplate:WikiProject HertfordshireHertfordshire articles

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

stylings

I believe the wife of a life peer is properly styles as "lady X of Y" and not "baroness X of Y", as the latter is the style of a woman life peer in her own right. Correct me if I'm wrong. Ulpian 19:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear where she was born, although one can assume she was born in Britain from the subsequent paragraph? Mdecker london 08:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Irving

However, in 1992 she defended David Irving in her Sunday Times column [1] [2] and has also defended Jean-Marie Le Pen.

The above quote has been removed from the article. The source is Irving's own site so we could do with further investigation. If anyone could find a copy of the July 5, 1992 edition of the Sunday Times to verify the article referred to it would be helpful. Catchpole 18:06, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any further additions to the article should make it clear that the Irving writings were about free-speech issues, not Irving's Hitler revisionism. People of Jewish heritage who are strong supporters of Israel tend not to have much use for Irving's views. Implying that Amiel has, would look odd. 65.89.68.24 (talk) 16:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Involvement in Conrad Black's legal issues

Why is there no discussion of her many references in the legal proceedings against Conrad Black (e.g., lavish birthday parties paid for with corporate funds)?

How is this allowed? "Lord Black bought a full pardon from President Donald Trump in May 2019" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:41:C402:57D0:7DF9:2BAF:5D47:6675 (talk) 04:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Theory

The theory that she was any kind of "urchin" is based on her own assertion.

School friends say that she lived in a middle-class house at that time. She would have had difficulty getting into university if she had left formal education at the age of 14. It might have been difficult to get a job or dole at 14. I am not familiar with Canadian conditions at that time.

<><><><><> Something in her reported lifestyle does not add up; quite wierd actually. According to the UK Telegraph she owns a "$2.6 million, 26-carat diamond ring that he (Black) had bought for her" but nightly, her "day ends with hand laundry". Good grief, why would anyone with huge assets such as this bother to clean their underwear? For a few bucks a piece, why not wear a fresh, clean pair every day and save the laundry time at the sink? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/07/13/wconrad213.xml

Lots of rich people have simple tastes in some things, however lavish their lifestyle may be otherwise. Cooking at home is also popular with some of them, though they can afford cooks, and maids, and washers-up.

Also, for personal wear, lots of items are more comfortable when they are broken in, and you don't want to be getting new ones all the time. Shoes, for example. 65.89.68.24 (talk) 16:12, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Atheist?

I noticed recently that this Amiel has been tagged as an atheist. Nowhere in this article does it talk about her religious beliefs. Shouldn't a category addition need to rely on a reference to this? Unless someone does soon I will remove these categories. Atrian 13:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The NNDB entry in the external links section lists her as an atheist. Catchpole 15:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NNDB is hardly a reliable source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.72.27.204 (talk) 17:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Married Life

This section only references four of the five husbands listed in the side-panel. Valetude (talk) 00:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And now the text has *more* husbands than those listed in the side-panel. What is going on?

The infobox was missing David Graham (Amiel's husband from 1984 to 1990). Now fixed and properly sourced in the main text. Philip Cross (talk) 08:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barbara Amiel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Barbara Amiel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150616084110/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/36870 to http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/node/36870
Corrected formatting/usage for https://web.archive.org/web/20090712082115/http://archive.salon.com:80/mwt/feature/2004/09/03/lady_black/print.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Legal action by Hollinger

What exactly was it about the Vogue interview that provoked Hollinger International to take legal action against the couple and other executives? It seems to have just been Barbara boasting how many fur coats she'd got. Valetude (talk) 19:59, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leading Hollinger shareholders were raising issues with the couple's apparent siphoning of money in 2001, so the Wikipedia article may still be overstating a direct link with the Vogue interview. Multiple sources do blame Black's marriage to Amiel and her spending as part of the reason for his downfall. However, very many of the sources cited are heavy with such gossip which is inappropriate to use. Philip Cross (talk) 07:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amiel's dermatomyositis

surprised that no one has mentioned this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.65.128 (talk) 22:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have just checked online sources for Amiel's medical condition, Dermatomyositis. None of them are sufficiently precise for a mention in the article. To prevent the issue being added to the article at a random point, a putative citation might indicate when Amiel was diagnosed with the condition. None of them do, even the Google Books preview of Amiel's memoir. Philip Cross (talk) 09:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]