Talk:Balvenie distillery

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

How do you pronounce this?--24.117.25.35 04:27, 16 December 2006 (UTC)DaveF[reply]

How do you pronounce this : I take it as ball ve n e. Just bought a bottle and wondered how to pronounce it, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.109.21 (talk) 05:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tasting notes are not encyclopedic

The tasting notes are a good addition to the article, although they should be qualified in some way, because they read promotional.

I added a cn -- half as a joke.

Edit by Nestorius

Hi all. Re: distillery vs. whisky POV, FYI this has been discussed extensively here and here. Also, this article should be moved to 'The Balvenie' from 'Balvenie'. Tasting notes should probably be removed as well. Nestorius (talk) 18:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Balvenie' vs. 'The Balvenie'

I think it is the latter, and the distillery's marketing seems to reinforce this. I think a page move is in order - anyone disagree? Slainte Nestorius (talk) 19:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore this. Nestorius (talk) 00:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Balvenie" vs. "Balvenie Distillery"?

As is illustrated on Dufftown, some related distillery pages are named "Whatever_Distillery", and some, like this one, as merely "Whatever". Consistency seems a good thing, don't it? I propose renaming this page "Balvenie_Distillery". Jackrepenning (talk) 00:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. Cúchullain ^t/c 20:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Balvenie → Balvenie distillery – Per WP:AT and WP:NCCAPS I'm moving Scottish Whisky distilleries to the format "X distillery". I am unable to do this one as a page already exists there (a redirect). Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 09:38, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. It's the title of an establishment, therefore a proper name, therefore both parts should be capitalised. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, there is currently a discussion going on at WP:SPIRITS regarding this which you may be interested in Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 19:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Balvenie distillery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.whisky.com/whisky-database/distilleries/details/fdb/Distilleries/Details/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304085525/http://news.stv.tv/video/1595087783/ to http://news.stv.tv/video/1595087783/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]