Talk:Bale Out/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Specific concerns

One niggle is the fair use image, I'm not an expert and as there is only the one image, I'm pretty sure it works okay. Whether this would pass FAC, I have no clue.
The other niggle is the quotations in the lead. They are all attributed in the body of the article, but generally it's expected that quotations will be cited whenever they are used. I won't hold back GA status on this, but I'd be more comfortable if they were cited in the lead also.

Thanks for doing the GA Review! - I added cites to the quotes in the lede. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 16:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]