This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
I removed the assertion that RA8485 makes consumption of dog meat illegal in the Philippines. That assertion is not confirmed by the cited supporting source and, in fact, RA8485 has nothing whatever to do with the consumption of dog meat (or any other kind of meat) -- it is concerned with supervising and regulating the establishment and operations of facilities utilized for breeding, maintaining, keeping, treating or training of animals.[1].
While I was at it, I imported some supporting cites from the Dog meat article for countries mentioned as eaters of dog meat. I removed mention of Cambodia because that article doesn't mention it (or, of course, cite a source which would support that mention). Wtmitchell(talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 08:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
