Talk:Artur Bodanzky

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

references

As far as I could see, while translating this article to hewiki, there is no mention of Bodanzky on any of the 5 references. Why were they put there in the first place? S. Kedem

Original research

Many thanks to the editor(s) who have added substantially more material to the article recently. Unfortunately some of it breaches Wikipedia's WP:NPOV and WP:OR policies, so had to be removed or modified. Here is the material that was edited:

It is likely that Chotzinoff's assessment is incorrect in that his book is a self-evident exercise in hagiography in which every conductor is found wanting except Toscanini. This appears to be the opinion or speculation of a Wikipedia editor. Per WP:OR and WP:V material such as this must be taken from a reliable source and cited.

Today, based on the recorded evidence, which is considerable but of low technical quality, it is not possible to rate Bodanzky as a conductor of the very first rank, but he does seem entitled to an assured place in the second ranks, rather than the purgatory to which he has been assigned by most of the critics and historians writing after his death. Once again, this appears on its face to be the personal opinion of an editor. According to the neutral point of view policy of this website, such opinionated material can only be cited from published sources. Cheers. Grover cleveland (talk) 05:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Artur Bodanzky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041010094931/http://www.naxos.com:80/scripts/Artists_gallery/other_artists.asp?artist_name=Bodanzky_Artur&artisttype=historical to http://www.naxos.com/scripts/Artists_gallery/other_artists.asp?artist_name=Bodanzky_Artur&artisttype=historical

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]