Jump to content

Talk:Arrack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Source of arrack in Sri Lanka

[edit]

I'm not an expert in this subject, but there seems to be some mistakes in this article that I would wish someone more knowledgeable would check. The toddy in Sri Lanka, and I believe similar brews in several other countries, is not usually made from coconut but from inflorescences of fishtail palms, Caryota. Indeed most gardens in Sri Lanka have a few Caryota in different stages of development for this purpose. Whether this toddy is used for distilling arrack, I'm not sure.

I have seen coconut arrack for sale in Sri Lanka, but I would seem to remember that is made from the coconut fruits, not a tapped inflorescence. I'm happy to be corrected here. 58.182.198.41 (talk) 08:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you need to be corrected here. They dragged Sri Lanka into the article in a naïve attempt to back their false claims of the drinks' origin. First, they have changed the spelling by adding a second "r".
Then they dropped grapes and morus, from which the drink is usually made, because they don't grow where they claim the drink originated. That's enough. Other people commenting here have already noticed the amount of nonsense in the article. Let it stay that way. Torschlauch (talk) 13:13, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


[Untitled]

[edit]

Please expand the article and add info about arrak in the middle east - israel, turkey, etc...

Home Brew in Indonesia

[edit]

Some of the Arrak I came across while in Indonesia over the last couple of weeks was really strong stuff. I even got some of the local stuff which was more or less moonshine. The stuff I had was apparently based on rice. Even though it didn't taste all that good (somewhat bitter); for some reason I liked the stuff. Bdelisle (talk) 01:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replica article

[edit]

Isn't this article about the exact same thing as Arak (drink) ? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 01:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have different ingredients. FunkMonk (talk) 01:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Different ingredients, different flavor (Arak is anise flavored) and different color. So no, it appears to be a different drink with a similar sounding name. --nsaum75¡שיחת! 03:37, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The name is exactly the same, though, the article states this. Difference in transliteraton doesn't really make it a different name, FunkMonk (talk) 08:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's just local variations of the same drink. They all ultimately come from Arabic: http://etymonline.com/index.php?term=arrack&allowed_in_frame=0 -iopq (talk) 05:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:37, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]



Arrack (drink)Arrack — Currently Arrack is a redirect to the Arak disambiguation page, even though this drink is the only entry spelled this way. We should also expand the hatnote to include a link to the disambig for confused spellers. JaGatalk 19:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. There are no standards for how the other types of arrak (or places) are spelled in Latin, so they could potentially be spelled arrack too. FunkMonk (talk) 19:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hence the hatnote. (BTW this article was at Arrack until FunkMonk moved it a couple of weeks ago - I'm just looking to restore it.) --JaGatalk 19:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Mhiji (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

alak

[edit]

in the Philippines it is called alak.. Merndirigma (talk) 16:29, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

separate page <-> areca

[edit]

The book cited here as being the proof of some experts believing the name is derived from areca nut is some 180 years old. Whatever the state might have been back then, there is no reason to believe that today. The word for areca in no major language of South-East Asia is areca so the basis for that argument is void. Also, it is a known fact (proven, among other things, linguistically and directly through historical annals) that there has been a long standing contact between Arabic speaking nation(s) and Malayo-Polynesian speakers. Furthermore, the word (a/ai)ra(k/g) has become either universal or a specialised word for various alcoholic beverages (from fruit to rice to horse milk as a material for fermentation) all around Asia. There seems to be no reason to think this book brings any relevant information. The word areca either sounds similar or is derived from the word for the alcohol. Also, not in Sanskrit-related languages but in some Dravidian is the word for areca remotely resembling arak present.

Therefore I propose to leave out this nonsense and merge this article into the one about arak unless the reason to separate them is some native speaker's (of English, that is) idea that those concepts are completely and utterly unrelated which would of course be a reason to keep them as they are. A final note - how could a word kasivu become arak? --Muflon 83 (talk) 23:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arrack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arrack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Geography and product confusion

[edit]

The lede states that arrack is produced in "the Middle East and Turkey", yet neither of these are covered in the main article, which talks mainly about South and SE Asia. For what it's worth, I for one have never seen such a drink in all my time living and travelling in Turkey. I'm wondering if the confusion arises from the Turkish 'national drink' Rakı, which also gets it name from the same Arabic word arak as does arrack, but is a completely different thing. (In fact, a passage in the article Arak (drink) pretty much suggests this.) Unless anyone has any objections, I will edit the lede to better reflect the rest of the article, including removing the reference to ME/Turkey. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling Inconsistency - Definitive New Source

[edit]

Spelling: The article spells the key word in several different ways, including "arrack," evidently the common English spelling, "arak," perhaps the Indonesian spelling, which is explained in the article, and "arrak." While I tend to think that the standard English spelling is appropriate, I regret that I do not know how Wikipedia typically resolves such inconsistencies. Source: The Oxford Companion to Spirits and Cocktails (Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. 37–38; 240 [illustration of label]; ISBN 978-0-19-9311113-2. PlaysInPeoria (talk) 17:45, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]