Talk:Areosynchronous orbit

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Mars / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mars task force.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Height

What height above Mars is this? This might be added to this article. Ergzay 18:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done The orbital altitude of an Areosynchronous orbit is approximately 17,000 km. I have just added the info to the article, with a citation. This would be a circular orbit for any Areosynchronous orbit, as well as for the subset of Areosynchronous orbits that are on the Martian equatorial plane; i.e., Areostationary orbits. Cheers. N2e (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"areo"

Can anyone supply a reference to a scientist or engineer using the term "Areosynchronous orbit". There are only a few people who use terms like "seleno-" for the Moon, "are-" for Mars, and "herme-" for Mercury. The majority just use terms like "lunar geotherm." "Geometry of the surface of mars" "Martian Geodesy", etc. I find this (1) uninformative; and (2) pretentious. What is the term for Venus???

Perhaps "Martian synchronous orbit" or "Martian geosynchronous orbit" is more appropriate? I would have never found this page had I not seen the orbit navigation footer. Lunokhod 11:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You could consider creating a REDIRECT page entitled Martian synchronous orbit. The only trouble is, redirs to totally unsourced articles are frowned upon. So it either case, some editor will have to find some sources for this info to stay in Wikipedia. A quick look on Google scholar (at this URL) in Feb 2013 finds 34 scholarly references to Areosynchronous orbit. Martian synchronous orbit gets only a single scholarly reference. N2e (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Areosynchronous orbit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304001744/http://www.cwc.oulu.fi/~carlos/WSNPapers/LA01.pdf to http://www.cwc.oulu.fi/~carlos/WSNPapers/LA01.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]