Talk:Archontophoenix cunninghamiana

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that a range map be included in this article to improve its quality.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Archontophoenix cunninghamiana is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Contentious statement in "Distribution" section

The unsourced statement "They arrived in Australia from the landbridge created 45,000 years ago due to the receding ocean levels during the last glacial period, but the probable 'native' environment in prehistory was Indonesia" must be considered to be highly inaccurate (if not pure conjecture) for at least two reasons: First, plants whose seeds are distributed by birds do not depend on land bridges to expand their range, especially in this region where there are numerous islands connecting Indonesia and Australia that can be reached by the birds within hours or minutes. Secondly, if this did indeed come from Indonesia, where are the parents? Archontophoennix does not exist naturally in that country. I propose that this statement be deleted, but I'll wait for some discussion first. If there is no response here by 1st June, I'll remove it. Junglenut |Talk 08:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Picture

I doubt that the palms on the picture are Archontophoenix cunninghamiana, as they usually have a very long crownshaft. The plants on the picture lack these and rather resemble Syagrus or something else. Alfred Neubert (talk) 20:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Albert. You're partly correct - the one in the centre is A. cunninghamiana, but the other two (which dominate the image) are not. I've replaced that image, and removed another from the gallery which is also dubious. Cheers Junglenut |Talk 20:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]