Jump to content

Talk:Aphaena submaculata

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Aphaena submaculata/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Etriusus (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 09:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Review

[edit]

Starting review shortly. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 09:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • entomologist Frederick William Hope. Forgot to link "e"
 Done
  • was first scientifically described Does this species have multiple scientific descriptions?
 Done, rrworded
  • Simultaneous => Around the same time or something like that.
 Done
  • the tegmina are a dull red. red what?
 Done
  • Size of Aphaena submaculata burmanica?
 Done
  • Is that you could find on behavior and distribution?
Unfortunately, yes. I've done a handful of planthoppers and they tend to not get much love in source coverage.
  • Traits and evolution of wing venation pattern in paraneopteran insects - a very brief mention regarding vein patterns, I elected not to add this since it would be way to technical/not concise
  • 'From Volume 21'- this is just a repeat of the Fauna of Nepal source, the latter is more direct
  • 'Nomenclatural changes in the suborders Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera) and Paleorrhyncha (Palaeohemiptera)' -unable to find a non-pay walled version
  • 'Catalogo das especies americanas de Laternariidae:(Homoptera; Fulgoroidea)' - unable to find any mention of the species, this just seems to be a basic list of nomenclature histories, and an outdated one at that.

Very well prepared article. Had little to complain about and would like to see this article promoted to GA soon. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 09:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolverine XI:, that should be everything. Thanks for the review. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 22:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 03:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aphaena submaculata
Aphaena submaculata
  1. Template:Did you know nominations/Prostate cancer
  2. Template:Did you know nominations/Karl Loewenstein (banker)
Improved to Good Article status by Etriusus (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 21 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

🏵️Etrius ( Us) 01:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  • Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hook is interesting and sourced. QPQs are done. All set. Thriley (talk) 10:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Etriusus and Thriley: I added the image to the nomination and will promote. Lightburst (talk) 03:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]