Talk:Angkor Airways

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Angkor Airways article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Defunct airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the Defunct Airlines task force.

Cambodia Low‑importance

Angkor Airways is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Airlines / Airways

Angkor Airlines and Angkor Airways appears to be two different airlines - this article mixes facts between the two - I would suggest they need different articles. MilborneOne 22:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Angkor Airways" is that one that's currently flying (or at least has a plane parked at REP as of this morning). http://www.airlinecodes.co.uk/ lists Angkor Airways and Angkor Air as controlled duplicates, but I can't find any records of an "Angkor Airlines" or ICAO:AOL. Jpatokal 11:31, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Angor logo1.PNG

Image:Angor logo1.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement?

Does the introduction or even the article seem like it's an advertisement rather than fact about the airline? It doesn't say anything except that it focuses on safety and that the airline focuses to be one of the top airlines in the world. Advertisement?

You're absolutely right - this little article has been neglected for a long time. Feel free to edit it into more neutral language. Cheers, Paxse 16:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added the Advert tag today, maybe this will help attract some attention. Aep (talk) 00:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]