Talk:Alternative Views

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Austin Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas - Austin (assessed as Low-importance).

Son,

I am disappoint. Why IS IT that I can find almost all the information that is restricted by society, frowned upon by government authorities, and capriciously dismissed by huge swathes of academics right here on this page: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Category:Low-importance_Alternative_Views_articles --NOTBROWSINGFROMANIPADDRESS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.99.118.9 (talk) 22:28, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe... __meco (talk) 13:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marxist

Why not openly admit that this is a Marxist publication? --41.150.17.142 (talk) 21:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any non-biased references you can cite to state this? You know, just because someone says something is Marxist, doesn't mean it is.--Robert Wm "Ruedii" (talk) 05:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of references.

There is a serious lack of references on this article. If someone better versed on this topic could go find some, it would be greatly appreciated. I wouldn't even know where to start --Robert Wm "Ruedii" (talk) 05:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Alternative Views. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]