Talk:Alloxylon flammeum

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alloxylon flammeum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Alloxylon flammeum is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 22, 2014.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 17, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
February 8, 2013	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 16, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that there are more plants of Alloxylon flammeum (pictured) in cultivation than there are in the wild in its native Queensland?

Current status: Featured article

Australia: Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Alloxylon flammeum is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alloxylon flammeum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:50, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is already a well-written and composed article, well, I find only these few comments to make:

~~I think the genus should be mentioned in the lead no matter the family is or not.~~

added Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Could a bit of taxonomic detail be added in the lead? I had a doubt, actually - who then really described this species or made it first known?~~

added Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By what you say in lead and "Taxonomy", I infer that the species was formally described in 1991 by Weston and Crisp but was named in 1995. Sounds a bit confusing to me. Also, one fact is clearly mentioned in the lead, while another is stated in "Taxonomy". Needs to be uniform, surely. Just one more thing I noticed, that no year is mentioned in the infobox as when the species was named "binomial authority" part). Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:14, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

gah, my bad. Should have been 1991 from the outset. 1995 Flora of Australia was the big official work, but I forgot about its description being in a 1991 paper....fixed now Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:41, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~The lead seems small. I just had a look at another GA, Cordyline australis (in fact you have reviewed it!). It mentions much description and distribution details. Should be same here as well.~~

~~working on it.~~ Now expanded a bit. To be fair, this article is much smaller than the cordyline one. Do you think it is big enough now? Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Considering what it comprises of, I think this article has what it needs. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:13, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~You say it has been given Vulnerable status by NCA. But neither is it sourced nor is it mentioned anywhere in the article.~~

d'oh! ~~Will find some official government pages....~~got some info in now. Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Don't forget to link the fact in the infobox. Are EPBC Act and NCA related?~~ Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:14, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One is state, the other national. ~~Will sort out later today.~~ The state predated the national legislation. updated now. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~I think the three consecutive images squash up the text, while the latter part has none of them. Could it be balanced?~~
~~Link "graft" in "Cultivation".~~

linked Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~The author names in the citations need to be consistent in format (compare Crisp, Michael D. with Johnson, L. A. S. with Hodge, Merv).~~

everyone knows Merv as Merv - ditto Mike Crisp and Lawrie Johnston. Will tweak.... Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I meant you should write the names in any of these three ways (say, the name Lawrence Alexander Sidney Johnson) - Johnson, Lawrence A. S. ; Johnson, L. A. S. ; Johnson, Lawrence Alexander Sidney. And this applies to all the names you write. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:14, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, as far as possible everyone has a first name and second initial if they have one. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's it. I wait till you respond to my comments. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:50, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for being quick off the mark, was just about to go to bed...which I will do now. You are welcome to play with the images. Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quick work of yours, really! You have well messed with the images, the thing looks fine now :D. I have stroke through resolved issues. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:14, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think now the article is ready for becoming a GA. I pass it. Congrats! Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:13, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notophyll

The normal reader cannot be expected to understand "notophyll vine forest". --Ettrig (talk) 06:57, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I agree...I have been meaning to make an article for that....Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:27, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks in blurb text

Redlinks are totally okay in FA articles.

But it might be nice for someone to take the initiative to go ahead and create Peter Henry Wilson and Michael Douglas Crisp, so there aren't redlinks in the WP:TFA blurb text.

Just a suggestion,

— Cirt (talk) 18:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alloxylon flammeum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alloxylon flammeum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120906165054/http://asgap.org.au/APOL29/mar03-14.html to http://asgap.org.au/APOL29/mar03-14.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]