Talk:Allan Pease

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 July 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Allan Pease is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

No comment on criticism

He's controversial and many would say a pseudo-scientist, but this reads as a favourable book synopsis, disregarding the lack of scientific basis for his claims. I'm not best placed to expand the article, but it would be helpful if someone did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.113.125.32 (talk) 23:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've just outright removed the section. It was pretty much a book review for the most part. Plus we don't really do individual book entries on an author's page unless it's the only thing they're known for. I'll try to find sources for this and I can see where they're somewhat mentioned in various texts, but there's a bit of a hard time finding sources for this article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:51, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, most of the content of the article was removed. [1] Not sure it was necessary to be quite that radical! Andrewa (talk) 06:07, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He is certainly controversial, and he and his wife and often (not always) co-author Barbara have particularly offended many feminists, see for example Gender and Wildfire: Landscapes of Uncertainty by Christine Eriksen. Andrewa (talk) 06:07, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]