Talk:Alburgh (town), Vermont

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Quebec / History Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of Canada.

Definition of exclave

It appears from looking at the map that Alburgh would be connected to the U.S. by a stretch of U.S. territorial waters, thus making it debatable if it is really an exclave in the true sense of the word. Anyone care to comment on this? Hoplophile (talk) 08:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have that backwards, it IS an exclave in the true, sense of the word. Territorial waters are purely a legal construct, not part of the science, if you will, of geography. So, technically, it is. Practically, it is not an exclave in the same way that Northwest Angle or Elm Point are, especially because a bridge traverses the bay separating it from the rest of Vermont. But, geographically speaking, it is significant. DavidSSabb (talk) 06:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article

See http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?Date=20060419&Category=NEWS&ArtNo=60419002&SectionCat=&Template=printart for documentation that Alburgh did in fact change its name in April of 2006.

Is this really an exclave? I was browsing Google Earth, and it sure looks like US Highway 2 runs literally right down main street. I don't think this is in the same class of isolation as Point Roberts, WA or the Northwest Angle in Lake of the Woods, MI. Perhaps the verbiage on this page could clarify that (and the matching verbiage on the other two pages). I thought I'd ask here first as I've never been to Vermont... Davidlwilliamson 07:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what the precise definition of an exclave is, but I've been to Alburgh numerous times and I can assure you that it is possible to drive there without crossing through Canada. Admittedly, you have to cross over a bridge from either Rouses Point, NY to the west or West Swanton, VT to the east (or travel down through the Hero Islands to the south via a series of bridges before crossing back to the mainland). MK2 22:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

town and village

For those of us unacquainted with New England local government: what's the difference between the town and Alburgh (village), Vermont? Does the town contain the village, or what? This ought to be explained. —Tamfang (talk) 00:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The village of Alburgh is incorporated, and a part of the town of Alburgh. Vermont has many town-and-village-with-the-same-name situations such as Alburgh; thus we have an article Village (Vermont). Nyttend (talk) 00:53, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alburgh (village), Vermont ought to say so explicitly, then. I'll go there now ... —Tamfang (talk) 05:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alburg / Alburgh

In 2006, Alburg voters attending Town Meeting decided to revert the name to its original spelling of Alburgh. This does not mean that everything in the town changed. There are still businesses using the shorter spelling for legal reasons, and "named locations" within the town (e.g., Alburg Springs, East Alburg) which did not change; this would also apply to the body of land: officially changing the name of the town does not mean that the Alburg Tongue automatically became the Alburgh Tongue.--Mfwills (talk) 11:47, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, those issues are standard when it comes to city name changes (see Etymology of Pittsburgh). Do you think the article is misleading right now? And if so, what would you change? —Bill Price (nyb) 19:37, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Alburgh (town), Vermont/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

For comments, contact me. --Starstriker7(^{Say hi}_{or see my works}) 03:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 03:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alburgh (town), Vermont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]