This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska
"Completely unsourced" doesn't cut it as a rationale when the article's sources were removed in the previous edit. There's a small group of editors who focus on US broadcasting topics. They routinely shit all over WP:DEGRADE / WP:NTEMP by editing solely to reflect a property's current license status or current ownership status, instead of reflecting a historical record. The editor who removed those sources was warned of the dangers of making these sort of edits many, many years ago, yet continues to engage in this behavior anyway. What's worse, I believe this editor is an admin. I've witnessed a clear pattern of indiscriminate deletionism coming from the editor who PROD'ed this. So I'm supposed to believe that an individual radio station is notable but its parent entity isn't notable? That defies all logic. Specific to Wikipedia, it suggests that we're creating a directory of entities which surpass arbitrary or imaginary thresholds. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 10:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
