Jump to content

Talk:Airbus A321

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A320neo Section Out-Dated?

[edit]

Hi,

the section on the A320neo seems to be outdated. It is still referring to it being in development. It is already in production as the A320neo article states.

Bjoern

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

main pic change

[edit]

While the current picture is quite nice, its operator is also quite rare and may distract from the subject, so I went through commons to find a similar one from largest operator American. I picked one with the small initial wing fences instead of the later winglets upgrade to avoid confusion with the neo. Alternatively, I found another one in clean config, may be a little unusual.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 14:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

no bibliography

[edit]

References like "Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 50" and "Eden 2008, p. 25" appear but there are no titles listed. Tom239 (talk) 02:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, maybe due to poor copy-pasting when the A321 (like the A319 or A318) was split from the main A320 article. This ref system may not be as robust as inline citations. Anyway, I would propose to merge those variants splits back in the main A320 article, all it have done is to make the maintenance more difficult.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A321NX

[edit]

One of these flew over today, I checked Wikipedia and there is no comment on it :(. Perhaps someone might add something. https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1388129 Chris.Bristol (talk) 12:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is an A321Neo with a "Cabin Flex" interior. Cabin Flex is described on the Neo Page. MilborneOne (talk) 16:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]