Talk:Agriculture in London

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 September 2008. The result of the discussion was keep; tagged for merge to Geography of London.

What do they grow?

WHAT DO THEY GROW???? WHAT DOES LONDON GROW? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.50.172 (talk) 00:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Oppose I'm not seeing a reason to merge. Colonel Warden (talk) 21:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because it can be, would basically sum up my position. It isn't long enough, or distinct enough (in terms of subject matter) from Geography of London to warrant its own article. There is also no precedent for creating an article such as this - my point being that, if there were a series of 'Agriculture in [city]' articles that weren't stubs you could justify this one's existence perhaps. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I still oppose. The target for the merger seems arbitrary - why not Economy of London or London itself? Or why not an article upon Urban agriculture in general? It is better to develop the article with its well-sourced topic as is and only consider reorganisation after we have accumulated more material. Colonel Warden (talk) 20:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well at the current time it's more about land usage, and it could easily be seen to fall under human geography. If it develops more, then I'll let it go. As I already said, I think this was created in error, and if it had been part of GoL in the first place, no one would have thought to create this article. It certainly needs work anyway if it is to remain. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 23:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - This article, as I stated previously needs a rescue tag, but brings with it a host of topics that may only be seriously delved into if the article has its own topic. Firstly, there is the issue of urban farming, which consists of the classic city "garden" variety (a leftover of the '70's) and commercial farming. There is also the issue of the preservation of green belts around the urban areas, which farmer have stated they preserve. It fits a curious mix of farming in the GLA, mixed with community activism, access to local produce (a point of the WHO in recent reports), lower cost for transportation, feeding the poor, and environmental concerns. In other words, it cuts across categories, and is in the news as we speak.^[1] It is, in all actuality, a rather important issue on its own. I would definitely keep it as is and develop it further.Yachtsman1 (talk) 01:39, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ [1]

Nice Work

Glad to see this expanding. Well done.Yachtsman1 (talk) 00:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; going further back, maybe something could be done about the affect of the industrial revolution on London agriculture? I'm not as familiar with the subject (although it obviously facilitated a decline). Yohan euan o4 (talk) 19:40, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Low Emissions Zone

Might be worth mentioning agricultural vehicles are exempt from the LEZ. [2] [3] MRSC (talk) 06:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Agriculture in London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [1]

[1]