Talk:Adapted Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The statements about events in 2007 are clearly written by a Russian. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 169.252.4.21 (talk • contribs).
- They're written by Rjecina, a Croatian (I think) who is - I believe - opposed to NATO and its policies. His contributions need to be balanced and sourced indeed. Sijo Ripa 13:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I am from Croatia. For comments if I am against NATO answer is not. I am against propaganda. About this article. There is no discussion that Russia is wrong because they do not have right to have soldiers in Moldova and Georgia if they want that this soldiers go home. When we speak about this treaty NATO is wrong because in period 1999 - 2001 Russia has worked in accordance with treaty and NATO not. When western propaganda speak that they are good and that russians are bad they always forget to explain why they have not been good between 1999 - 2001 and made ratification. Rjecina 14:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- Start-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class Europe articles
- Low-importance Europe articles
- WikiProject Europe articles
- Start-Class International relations articles
- Low-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles