Talk:Abraham Vereide

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Methodism Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Methodism work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Religion Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Abraham Vereide's anti-union views

Reference Jeff Sharlet's book "The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.93.212 (talk • contribs) 02:12, 18 December 2009

Which pages? --Kevinkor2 (talk) 15:09, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Honorary LLD

I'm re-inserting "honorary" before the LLD degree. See Legum Doctor. While it's true that LLD is always honorary in the U.S., that's not true in the rest of the world. Many outside the U.S. (in fact, many in the U.S.) may not be aware of that (I wasn't). Davemck (talk) 15:19, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed apparent copyvio material

In this edit Ivananderson (talk · contribs) introduces text which clearly has the imprint of having been lifted wholesale off some other work, i.e. the footnote digits remain ([14]). I have also realized that the same editor has made a number of previous edits bearing the same hallmark, and I am inclined now to remove all additions to the article made by this editor. I have made a Google search for one phrase within the most recently added text without anything turning up, however, unless some other explanation is given for these interspersed numbers in brackets, I move that we have to assume they indicate copyright violations. __meco (talk) 08:06, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that Ivananderson may be copying and pasting text from a previous version of a Wikipedia article.--Kevinkor2 (talk) 13:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, I have questioned him about this directly on his user talk page, so we'll probably have a clear picture of this in a short while. __meco (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The more fundamental concern is that this article has stopped looking like an encyclopedic article. Excerpts:

It was on the mountainsides standing in the midst of his flocks of sheep that he practiced his first homilies.
[he went to] to research the Spiritual moorings of America's heritage.
This phrase poignantly expressed a vision for the global endeavor of these two Norwegian Methodist pioneers

and so on... Even if there's no copyright issue, this article needs to be reverted to the last version not edited by a poetic apologist. Pichpich (talk) 03:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly written

Reads like a high school essay. Somebody fix it, please.50.0.36.98 (talk) 06:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An earnest editor needs help fitting his content into the Wikipedia format

To editor Dustinhedrick:. You seem to be new, since you have only two edits under this user name & they are both on this page. I used the View history link at the top of the main article page (looking at it here would only get you the history of this talk page, BTW) to compare your two versions side-by-side, and I saw how much earnest effort you put into rewording it.

However, when revising content of any kind, anywhere, it saves time and effort to consider how your content fits into the overall guidelines (here, the Wikipedia:Five pillars) before you start. By discounting some of the guidelines that try to steer WP articles towards neutrality and an overall balance of notability, you fell back into the same problems as your first draft.

Your point of view, like mine, drives what topics you volunteer to work on in here, and we need editors from all points of view contributing where they feel driven to contribute. We need you. But to be fair to every editor, every reader and, oh! let me be dramatic, To Knowledge Itself, we have to work towards building neutrality and accuracy in Wikipedia.

I wish I could help you on an individual level more than this, but even typing this off the top of my head was pushing it because my chronic illness is really acting up lately, and it always keeps me from being reliable. I only mention this to show you how heartfelt I'm being in response to your good effort.

Why not bring in another point of view from another source such as http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/15/opinion/sunday/a-christian-nation-since-when.html and then compare and contrast it with quotes and neutral summaries from the more sympathetic source you've already found? But before you make any changes at this point, please discuss them on this page first, either below my text or by clicking the New section link at the top of the page.

Also, To editor Davemck: and other experienced editors, if I pointed any wikilink to the wrong article, please feel free to fix it for me. Thanks in advance! --Geekdiva (talk) 11:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More to come on Prayer Breakfasts and Himmler

Including photographic evidence, eyewitness accounts, his FBI file (On or after December 8, 2016, FOIA requests currently being drafted), and German documents. 75 years is MANDATORY declassification. All the right wingers in the world will not be able to censor the additions and corrections being made to so many of Hitler's workers and churches in the USA as of the date December 8, 1941. 74.120.133.105 (talk) 19:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]