Jump to content

Talk:A Canterlot Wedding/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freywa (talk · contribs) 05:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well... I'm a brony and have followed the Canterlot wedding from the time it was announced. But, we need this to conform to Wikipedia standards, not Equestria Daily standards. Let's make this 20% cooler. Brohoof! FreywaParcly Taxel
20% Cooler
05:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Fantastic. All the articles I have reviewed before had required at least some edits to the prose.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Also fantastic. I've only got two gripes, which are listed below.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
  • Don't put songs where they're sung (either excise them or put them in a seperate section).
Done.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:39, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done! Ciaran Sinclair (talk) 15:02, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not an issue, but I would prefer to include the producers and directors in the lead.
Done. I also added a bit about ratings.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:39, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]