Talk:AEW Fight Forever

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (16 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (3 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants)
Redout (video game) (11 participants)
Old Grandma Hardcore (4 participants)
WePlay AniMajor (1 participant; relisted)
İstanbul Efsaneleri: Lale Savaşçıları (3 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (4 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Reception section

Recently there have been numerous edits to the reception section and I am concerned with attempts to create undue weight, seemingly mostly negative. I currently feel the section is balanced, with an equal spread of negative and positive points to reflect the 6-7/10 mixed response. I have messaged the Video Game discussions for additional input however. FrankWithStein (talk) 10:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do think your edits have improved the reception section. At the time of writing it looks a lot more balanced and reflective of the scores. — Czello ^(music) 11:09, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then take out the Metacritic aggregate. Every citation was taken from the professional critic scores that comprise it. Failedattempt (talk) 15:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The inclusion of a Metacritic aggregate is the standard across video game articles. FrankWithStein (talk) 08:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To reopen this topic, to avoid a back and forth again, I would like to open a civil discussion to reach a conclusion. Essentially at the moment, as stated before, the reception section cover most major points of praise and criticism. At the moment however, it at least appears that there is an effort to add as much criticism, regardless of weight and thus would like to ask why this is? By the same metric, we could add every single point of praise across every published online, but I would not encourage that either for the same reasons. FrankWithStein (talk) 06:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute about the game's director

The page lists Hideyuki Iwashita as the game's director, but he is not listed as such in the video game's credits. I believe this was based off of articles from 2021 stating or speculating that he would be in charge of the direction of the game, and maybe they used different language in the credits of the game for some reason, but both the game itself and MobyGames does not recognise him as the director. An official press release from AEW themselves also does not mention that he is the director. Douggiejones (talk) 16:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]