Talk:71: Into the Fire

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.

Neutrality (March 2015)

Hello,

This article needs a more balanced viewpoint, especially since it goes to great detail and length to vividly describe the story per the viewer's interpretations. As it stands, it reads more like a long review of the movie that seemingly praises the "war sacrifices" of the troubled protagonists, without much regard for accuracy in terms of the film's historical context.

For example, the article should at the very least mention how Koreans fought against each other during the Korean War (ostensibly a "civil war" between factions that rose out of the previous Japanese colonial era.)

As it stands, the article merely summarizes the film's story from start to finish, taking a rather simplistic "anti-Communist" stance to praise the film's depiction of South Korean student "volunteers" during the Korean War. It completely lacks outside references to all of the claims regarding the film's intentions, and is completely lacking in basic critical analysis. The article reads more like a movie review rather than a Wikipedia article as of March 2015.

Please fix when possible; if you plan to document the historical context, please provide more background for the discussion as a way to make the article more nuanced instead of how it currently stands. Thank you. Transnational Capitalists (talk) 04:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]