Talk:331st Guards Airborne Regiment

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

29-31 August events

Good evening, Kges1901.

I wanted to clarify: for three days of 29-31 August regiment's soldiers were literally prison guards for those Ukrainian troops who were captured during failed breakthrough attempt on 29 August. --VoidWanderer (talk) 19:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unconfirmed sources

https://twitter.com/LostWeapons/status/1505330935855681539 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.121.160.252 (talk) 07:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war re. UA claim

This has been reverted and re-added several times now. Please discuss here before continuing edit-warring. User:Goggo2022 User:Tom282f3 User:Mechanized battalion User:Buckshot06 Phiarc (talk) 15:29, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your notice.

However you might have been mistaken, as I do not participate in adding such phrases at all.

If you see the history of the page, the one time I reverted such statement is due to editing conflict, and I noticed your editing afterwards so I deleted the statement again. Please refer to the summary left on revision 1078219769 (13:36, 20 March 2022‎). Tom282f3 (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to participate in a discussion. Is there a compromise proposal on the table, something that would clearly highlight the fact that the Ukrainians *claim* such-and-such? Buckshot06 (talk) 06:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from some of the vandalistic edits changing "is" to "was" and setting the "active" in the infobox to "xxx-2022" all versions have been pretty clear that it's a claim. See e.g. http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=331st_Guards_Airborne_Regiment&diff=1078358320&oldid=1078330750 Phiarc (talk) 12:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]