Talk:3000 Miles to Graceland

Fair use rationale for Image:3000graceland.jpg

Image:3000graceland.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Critics panned this picture because it correctly prophesized the Global War On Terror as the Total Lie Culture

The 9-1-1 attacks were perfectly planned in terms of exploiting US authority patterns. The makers of this film saw those authority patterns. The critics--Authority--could not stand this aspersion. The movie came out just as the US Supreme Court was wiping its hands of the 2000 Presidential election, having chosen a winner, with the consent of the loser. The movie was dreamt up years before. These things do not spring up out of nothing. I'll bet you could do a very neat sociological study of the political connections of movie critics. The rest of the world, in which the movie made back its 62 million dollar investment, already knew this truth about the US. I wonder what the overseas critics said about it. No, I'll predict it. This is the US that everybody knows, and some want to get in on the action. Since 2001 that ambitious few has ridden the US kamikaze machine just about to earth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisrushlau (talk • contribs) 20:20, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 3000 Miles to Graceland. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://theenvelope.latimes.com/extras/lostmind/year/2001/2001st.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Changes to writing credit.

• What I think should be changed: the 2nd sentence, where it says, "Lichtenstein co-wrote the script with Richard Recco", should be changed to: "Richard Recco wrote the original screenplay on spec and later shared credit with Lichtenstein after changes were made to the final shooting script"
• Why it should be changed: As it is now I believe it leads readers to think that Myself (Richard Recco) and Lichtenstein were writing partners, or that "3,000 Miles To Graceland" was Lichtenstein's script that I participated in writing with him. That was never the case because I came up with the idea and wrote the original script on my own and copyrighted it in 1998, before I ever sent the script to anyone, and before Lichtenstein had any knowledge that I was writing a script in the first place.
• References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-feb-23-ca-28999-story.html

https://publicrecords.copyright.gov/detailed-record/10071564?query=Richard%20recco&field_type=Keyword&records_per_page=10&page_number=3&date_field=representative_date

Richardrecco (talk) 00:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Wording not precisely as requested, but adjustments have been made in line with the sourcing. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC)