Talk:2030s

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2030s article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article was nominated for deletion on 9/5/2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Unix time 2038 problem

I'm curious why references to Year 2038 problem keep getting deleted? It's not like it's a huge deal but it's not speculative, it's a very definite event that can be foreseen down the second. 66.76.14.59 (talk) 17:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The item listed under the year 2036 is a related problem, but not the same. The Unix rollover in 2038 should remain as an entry. Aquova (talk) 01:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 11, 2030 marking ten years of the pandemic

An earlier edit of mine was removed because in other diseases we don’t mark “anniversaries”. This isn’t an anniversary as this is an ongoing pandemic; it is on this date when (assuming the pandemic is still active as it most likely will be) we will have been in the pandemic for ten years. We mark on Wikipedia when significant situations have continued for prolonged periods of time (for example, the reign of Queen Elizabeth II having continued for seventy years on February 6, 2022). I’m open to discussion. Thank you!

  Hydroxyzine-XYZ (talk) 15:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We should not record anniversaries here at all. HiLo48 (talk) 22:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pages on the years of the 2030s

When should the pages for 2030, 2031, 2032, etc finally stop being redirects to this page? I would have to be 2029 at least because by then 2030 would be next year. BirchTainer (talk) 07:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Individual years for the 2030s should start rolling out by 2026, I'd say. Qwertipedian (talk) 20:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"will" to "expected to" or "planned to"

Would it not make sense to change this specific type of phrasing on this article? WP:CRYSTALBALL applies here. -1ctinus📝🗨 21:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Importance of periodic scheduled sports events?

Unless more details are specified (like the location where it would be held), we shouldn't be adding things like "the 2036 Summer Olympics will be held" because those are events that follow a schedule where years like 2024, 2028, 2032, and 2036 (leap years) are Summer Olympics and years like 2022, 2026, 2030 are Winter Olympics. Since the locations of these are not specified among other voided details (mostly because they're so far in the future), we should not have them. If we keep them, we might as well have Olympics and World Cup events all the way up to the end of the 21st century. Another problem is that it says "Summer Olympics WILL happen". I believe another topic states this but sports events (among other types of occasions) can be postponed and cancelled. They should say "expected to happen". But again, we should only include those types of events up until we don't know anything about the details. Qwertipedian (talk) 20:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]