Talk:2025 Bihar Legislative Assembly election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

India: Bihar / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bihar (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

ChiragaPaswan.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Logo of CPIML Liberation.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Ajit Sharma.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Mahbub Alam.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

MahbubAlamCPIML.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2025

@Kalpesh Manna 2002@Sachin126@Davemck and others, User:Vikashchy8 is continuously trying to promote Jan Suraaj Party. Besides he is trying to impose his edits over others. He is also accused of hijacking other page as revealed in his talk page. Please discuss the matter here. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:27, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He is fewer know in case of politics of Bihar and moving content as like own legislative assembly Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kalpesh Manna 2002, @Sachin126, @Davemck, Vikashchy8's words clearly indicate disruptive edits and personal attacks without being collaborative. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not showing what you are saying, I am doing what is correct Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mr XYZ we have not a personal war so discuss about matter there are 2 matter disclose now 1st Jan Suraaj Party as above section and 2nd left front of communist party. I think read more articles and reply me Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Under MGB, CPI(ML)L, CPI, CPI(M) are often together called Left Front/Left parties/The Left. (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/rjd-gets-26-congress-9-lf-5-in-bihar-mahagathbandhan-seat-deal/articleshow/108884827.cms) (https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/bihar-election-results-left-parties-leading-in-18-of-29-seats-say-trends-on-expected-lines/story-LrvJMEkwKuENpxFLBOpA4O.html) (https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/india-bloc-mahagathbandhan-seat-sharing-agreement-bihar-rjd-congress-left-parties-lok-sabha-polls-2520683-2024-03-29) XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And regarding Jan Suraaj Party, let the other editors make their opinion here. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

alliance and sub-alliance just remember INDIA alliance in all state one current case APP and INC 2025 delhi legislative assembly Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what about Jan Suraaj Party Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am requesting you not change jan suraaj you have no knowledge Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, be polite. Your words do not seem neutral. I have already written about discussion. See properly. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Balanced statement Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think matter is shorted for jan Suraaj Party why you changed Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vikashchy8 Besides Jan Suraaj is added. As it is not a major contender, it is not added separately. Besides I can see that User:Sachin126 told you not to add Jan Suraaj at top and to be neutral. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is major contender among even BJP bihar Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your words are clearly biased. Be neutral according to Wikipedia policies. XYZ 250706 (talk) 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are king of your kingdom Vikashchy8 (talk) 07:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vikashchy8 Let the other editors discuss. XYZ 250706 (talk) 07:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Jan Suraaj Party is a newly formed political party and is not yet recognized as a state party by the Election Commission of India. However, due to the media coverage the Jan Suraaj Party is receiving, it can be placed at the top of the list in the "Others" section. Portraying the JSP as a main contender by placing it at the top of the "Parties and Alliances" section above the NDA and Mahagathbandhan is unacceptable. Sachin126 (talk) 07:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sachin126, Vikashchy8 still continue to impose his edits. He has already broken 3 Revert Rule. Besides his words do not seem neutral and are definitely not polite and are somewhat personal attacks. Can you please make an appeal for blocking his edits? Actually I forgot how to do that and I am unable to find the page where the appeal should be made. XYZ 250706 (talk) 07:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can report it here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Sachin126 (talk) 07:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]