Talk:2017 vote of no confidence in the government of Mariano Rajoy/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AnonymousPurpose (talk · contribs)
With respect to the good article criteria, I believe this article has an amazing handling on all of it's requirements.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Great reference section, very well versed from all aspects of the situation. Along with the information being reliable it is also verifiable quite easily.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- The editors of this article did a great job elaborating on all topics to have the best interest possible.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- I deeply appreciate the attention to detail to include politics in this but not let it effect the argument and where the article stands.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- From what I've seen, almost all of the work done was completely organized and efficient.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All of the images and media used is properly captioned and looks to be sourced properly.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Amazing work! So happy to see such a quality article on Wikipedia that fairly covers everything.
- Pass/Fail:
07:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)