Talk:2011 Wisconsin Act 10

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 13 April 2011 by reviewer Wikipedian2 (talk · contribs).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2011 Wisconsin Act 10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Effective date

The lede states that the law went into effect on June 29, 2011. No source is provided, and this date is not mentioned in the body of the article. I have tagged the sentence in the lede regarding the effective date; it needs a source. I have not been able to find one. SunCrow (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

This article highlights the detractors' positions and minimizes support for the bill. Including helping to balance the budget, avoid layoffs, and support merit-based compensation. It does not cover that there was support for these changes, evidenced by it being part of Governor Walker's election platform and an unsuccessful attempt to recall Governor Walker after he signed the legislation which he won by a larger margin than the original election. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:4041:78DC:1800:2E91:45A1:6849:E072 (talk) 12:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The intro only states Walker's explanation. Perhaps the part about separating the collective bargaining part from the budget, which indicates it was never about the budget, should be included in the introduction? 2600:1700:B270:20F0:29A4:B235:E1A5:2004 (talk) 01:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]