Talk:2009–10 Manchester City F.C. season

Football: England / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Greater Manchester Low‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improvements

To anyone watching this article, or dropping by: I've been wondering if this article could have any improvements made, but am not sure what to do. I'm not a fan of the kind of "flashy" things some articles try to do, such as making a little graphic of the most used team or colour-coding matches according to score, but I'm wondering about little things, such as summaries of net money from transfers, or a list of the club staff, or something. Any thoughts? I don't want to act unilaterally, and I've only got a couple of half-decent ideas so please chip in. Falastur2 ^Talk 01:16, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding the table snippet

I've been toying with the idea of changing the little cut-out of our area of the Premier League table just above the match reports so it shows 7 teams (us, plus 3 above and 3 below) as opposed to 5. Anyone have opinions either way? Falastur2 ^Talk 21:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

presonally I like it at five, but don't have a strong opinion on it either way. Paul Bradbury 14:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll go with that. Wasn't sure myself about whether it was a good idea so I'm happy to bend with the wind and go with the popular suggestion - which with the lack of other comments is yours :) Falastur2 ^Talk 05:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transfers and loans

Filip Mentel - I think he moved to Dundee Utd in 2010 and is also listed under the 2010-11 season. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markem41 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems you're right. Fixed. Falastur2 ^Talk 02:01, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on 2009–10 Manchester City F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2009–10 Manchester City F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.premierleague.com/page/Headlines/0%2C%2C12306~1927339%2C00.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wrexhamafc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0%2C%2C10311~1740076%2C00.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cardiffcityfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0%2C%2C10335~1764574%2C00.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100112120337/http://www.malagacf.com/noticias/caicedo-refuerza-el-plantel-blanquiazul-2141.html to http://www.malagacf.com/noticias/caicedo-refuerza-el-plantel-blanquiazul-2141.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.football365.co.za/report/0%2C25737%2C16123_5439819%2C00.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.football365.co.za/report/0%2C25737%2C16123_5447230%2C00.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.football365.co.za/report/0%2C25737%2C14344_5452927%2C00.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.fcbarcelona.com/web/english/futbol/temporada_09-10/arxiu_partits/Gamper/jornada01/Barcelona_ManchesterCity/partit.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]