Talk:2008 United States Senate election in Alaska

Alaska Mid‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Update

I think someone needs to update this article. Based on what I read Ted Stevens won another term dispite the fact that he is a felon. Can someone update this article?

Lostinsidemyworld —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lostinsidemyworld (talk • contribs) 02:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For what its worth, the race has not been called by anyone as of yet. There's apparently 80,000+ ballots to be counted according to [1]. Absentee and early votes (2/3 of that total) should be counted this Wednesday (the 12th), the remainder are questionable ballots. Although I do concede this article reads as if the election had not happened yet, so at least the tense needs to be fixed. Strato|sphere 05:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Election infobox

I'm curious why the nominee names aren't showing up in the infobox when they're in the code. Any ideas/fixes? Oo7akbnd (talk) 02:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the "type" of election infobox from "Senate" to "presidential," and the names showed up.Oo7akbnd (talk) 04:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missing image

Where's the image linked to in the infobox? It's currently a redlink. - dcljr (talk) 05:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on United States Senate election in Alaska, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on United States Senate election in Alaska, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image vote

To prevent an edit war with whomever the IP editor is, I cannot ping them as such, I believe it's best that we vote on what the best image for 2008 is. I believe Option A would be better since it's only a few months shy of the election (B is half a decade away) & thus better represents how he actually looked in 2008. B is also used in the 2002 race, where it makes more sense. Thus, I also believe that we should prevent repetitiveness. If the concern is with brightness, the image can be appropriately brightened. I vote for Option A.

Option A
Option B

~ AlaskaGal~ ^_^ 16:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Although Option B is the higher quality version, Option A makes more sense since it was taken much closer to the election than Option B, as well as give the infobox it is situated more uniqueness, as all the other election infoboxes with Ted Stevens. I'd also like to point out that Mr. @AlaskaGal is one of the best Wikipedia users out there when it comes to everything Ted Stevens, so his input and changes to his wikis are in need of respect, and he also had the decency to start a talk page in order to rectify the situation. All in all, I vote Option A. NewDealChief (talk) 10:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

tysm ^^ <3 ~ AlaskaGal~ ^_^ 15:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I would have said option B is better as a) better resolution b) looking straight at the camera and c) it's only 3 years out of date from the election. But, I accept due process was followed. Gopchunk (talk) 00:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]