Jump to content

Talk:2007 World Series of Poker results

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured list2007 World Series of Poker results is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 6, 2009Featured list candidatePromoted

Table

[edit]

Like last year, here's an empty table to copy and paste as results update.

  • Number of buy-ins:
  • Total Prize Pool:
  • Number of Payouts:
  • Winning Hand:
Final Table
Place Name Prize
1st $
2nd $
3rd $
4th $
5th $
6th $
7th $
8th $
9th $

Event 2 results

[edit]

Where did you find the results for event 2? They're not listed on Cardplayer.com. The payout structure looks strange. Entheta 16:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Center aligned text?

[edit]

Someone changed the tables to align the text to the center. Personally, I think it looks better when it's aligned to the left, as on 2006 World Series of Poker Results. What do others think? I guess the most important thing is that we're consistent. Entheta 19:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More comprehensive results

[edit]

why did someone remove my efforts on full results. i personally believe these are relevant nformation poker enthusiastics will want to know —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Banacek555 (talkcontribs).

If you are referring to the "fall of world champions", the article will be too long if we add that info for every event. That information is trivia, and this article is about the final table results. For full results, there are other websites people can find this info. Compare 2006 World Series of Poker results. Entheta 13:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from being way excessively trivial, it was also factually wrong. Alllen Cunningham is not a main event world champion for instance. 2005 21:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok - granted but how about the final showdown hands - that will be interesting for historical purposes in future not only winning hand by also winning poker hands

Event 28 Results

[edit]

The $3,000 NL event was suspended when they reached the final 10 players last night, although it was still relatively early in the evening. It appears the WSOP and ESPN are content to call this the final table with 10 players, rather than the usual 9. Should we, therefore, add the 10th-place finisher to our results page? Stsharp413 14:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Event 31 Results

[edit]

Obviously the final table of the heads-up championship will only be two players, but how many finishers should we list for the "final table" payouts? I vote for the quarterfinalists (final 8) onward. Any other suggestions? Stsharp413 14:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Event 33

[edit]

It's a $1500 event. The article said it had 293 buy-ins, but the top prize was $464,867 ?? Can anyone check on this? I don't know where to look for the right info. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.129.69.211 (talkcontribs).

Yes, but it's a re-buy event, [[1]]
Duh.... Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.242.1.33 (talkcontribs)

Seniors event

[edit]

Does anyone know the minimum age limit for the seniors event? Entheta 20:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From what I read here I would say 55. ▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡Talk 02:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlexanderBorteh.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:AlexanderBorteh.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:10, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]