Talk:1971 Kimpo killings

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

King Kyung-yul.webp

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a news website

@Illegitimate Barrister: Wikipedia is not a news website, even if the news is almost half a century old. All the sources for this article date from late January 1971, within a few days, and no lasting impact is demonstrated. The one link [1] that perhaps demonstrates notability has been removed by another user because it looks like User-generated content. However, viewing the "printed version", I notice that the date is wrong and the event the (newspaper?) blog refers to happened a month later in February 1971. Perhaps you wanted the January 1971 blog entry] where this event is mentioned. However, that mention is only a passing summary of the event and gives no indication of any ongoing coverage or deeper analysis of this event, other than repeating the old news that this event happened. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 19:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]