This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
My assumption was to explain that half of wikipedia is in the same situation....There's a thousand and thosand pages that have only one reference... would you cancel also them ? --Carcamagnu (talk) 11:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There is a lot of other crap out there. It too needs sorting out, either by improving the references or by deleting the articles. But we can only fix it one page at a time ... which is why the fact that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason to leave any article in a poor state. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 11:30, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]