Talk:1949 in jazz

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Orphaned references in 1949 in jazz

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 1949 in jazz's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "nrb1":

From List of 1930s jazz standards: Listed in The New Real Book, Volume I
From List of post-1950 jazz standards: Listed in New Real Book, Volume I

Reference named "rvb":

From List of post-1950 jazz standards: Listed in The Real Vocal Book
From List of 1930s jazz standards: Listed in The Real Vocal Book

Reference named "rjb":

From List of 1930s jazz standards: Listed in The Real Jazz Book
From List of post-1950 jazz standards: Listed in The Real Jazz Book

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:06, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]