Talk:18-point agreement

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Malaysia Low‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyedit

This article was close to incomprehensible. I copyedited, and in the process removed some content which was either duplicated, redundantly copied from linked articles without attribution (WP:COPYVIO), or totally unrelated. Begoon ^talk 17:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.theborneopost.com/2011/09/16/an-agreement-forged-and-forgotten/#ixzz47kTE5ZFt https://www.scribd.com/document/167054292/Perkara-18-Sarawak#. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. retsacennS (Talk) (Pain and Suffering) 16:37, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't simply remove 18 Point

I found out that somebody busybody simply remove 18 Point Agreement with IGC Report & MA63 as valid supporting documents Yip Siew Loong (talk) 22:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not meant to be a direct host for primary documents, that is the purpose of Wikisource. If there is commentary to be made on the points, it needs to come from secondary sources, not from individual interpretation of the primary documents. CMD (talk) 22:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Original document for 18-point and 20-point agreement?

I cannot find any original document regarding the 18 point agreement. Some people claimed that it can be found in the appendices and annexes of the Malaysian agreement and 1963 Malaysia Act. However, I cannot find any reference to these on Wikisource in the following documents Malaysia Agreement, [1] and [2]. Are these documents complete or incomplete? It is impossible that all these original pre-constitutional documents are available online but the 18-point and 20-point original documents are nowhere to be found. We need an absolute point of reference with exact wordings, so some people will not modify the terms according to their whims and fancies. And the 18 and 20 points agreements should not be inferred from the IGC report or MA63 since they existed before the IGC report and MA63 right? We need the exact wordings!. Another point that is obviously lacking who really drafted the 18 point in Sarawak. What kind of modifications had been made from the 20 point agreement? Anyone with such info please enlighten me. Thanks. 110.159.236.170 (talk) 11:10, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]