This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Église Saint-Maurice, Soultz-Haut-Rhin is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pipe organ, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Pipe organWikipedia:WikiProject Pipe organTemplate:WikiProject Pipe organPipe organ
Yes, but the move of Notre-Dame was later, so I think things may have changed. Who decides on an English translation? Why "St Maurice's Church" (UK English, with no dot and a possessive "s") and not "St. Maurice" (rest of the world, and simpler)? And that question avoided with using the original name. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:10, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The community decides, there are no fixed rules, and I only asked why British English (vs. at least more international English) for a French church. No answer yet. I generally opt for the original name, for cultural flavour and authenticity, but am able to listen to good arguments why not to do so in a given case. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My argument for British English is that it is generally favoured on Wikipedia, a thing that both of us (wir sind beide weder Briten noch Amerikaner) generally go along with, for comfort's sake. And I don't understand your comparison with Notre-Dame de Paris, which is not a "Saint Somebody" church, but a cathedral of "Our Lady". There must surely be more appropriate examples. Anyway, I am following the consensus reached on St Thomas' Church, Strasbourg, which was based on a church in Copenhagen, Denmark (language spoken: Danish). --Edelseider (talk) 08:55, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I know nothing about "generally favoured" of British English, and we can still write an article in British English without following their peculiar naming of churches as if the Saint possesses them. Why follow some Danish church if you can follow some German church. Other things do exist. - Saint or not, Notre-Dame is a prominent example of sticking with the original name, especially in cases where there isn't much English literature on a topic. We shouldn't invent a name, even if there are models for such inventions. Which source calls this church St Maurice's? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:50, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I looked last night and probably was tired and overlooked something. The ref says "St Maurice". Commons is nice but no refs. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:25, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Commons is nice indeed, that's where I spend most of my Wikitime! The category links to 4 different pages, all referencing the fact that the organ is a Monument historique (we don't even need to argue about this point, it is a well documented instrument). --Edelseider (talk) 10:32, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Different topic, pre-review: can you please write a lead where you see Silbermann even if you have only seconds? One of the best-known organ builders ever. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) Also pre-review: please through out direct links to commons. - Fine, and first find a single ref referring to the invented English name, or move, - I couldn't find any. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:35, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]