Supplemental air carrier
Supplemental air carriers, until 1955 known as irregular air carriers, and until 1946 as nonscheduled air carriers or nonskeds, were a type of United States airline from 1944 to 1978, regulated by the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB), a now-defunct federal agency that then tightly controlled almost all US commercial air transport. From 1964 onward, these airlines were just charter carriers, but until 1964 they had limited but flexible ability to offer scheduled service, making them hybrids. In some ways they were the opposite of what the law then said an airline should be. Airlines then required CAB certification, but over 150 nonskeds exploited a loophole to simply start operating. The CAB determined where certificated carriers flew and what they charged. For the most part, irregular carriers flew where they wanted and charged what they wanted. CAB-certificated passenger carriers almost never died (the CAB preferentially awarded desirable routes to weak scheduled passenger carriers and if they got in serious trouble the CAB let them merge with a stronger carrier) but over 90% of supplementals did.
The legacy of supplemental air carriers includes coach class (all US air travel was first class before the nonskeds) and a share of the credit for inspiring 1979 US airline deregulation. Such carriers made little impact on the US airline system after deregulation and no former supplemental carrier survives, the last being World Airways which ceased operation in 2014. All original US scheduled cargo airlines (such as Flying Tiger Lines) also started as irregular airlines. The term "supplemental" was replaced with "charter" in the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, but survives in the regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (US airlines are dual certificated, with economic certification by the Department of Transportation (as successor to the CAB) and operational certification by the FAA).
The market share of supplementals was small (see Graph 1), but the carriers attracted much attention during the regulated era ending 1978:
- They offered low fares and competition in a system of high fares and little competition, providing a small amount of relative freedom in an otherwise tightly regulated regime.
- US scheduled carriers constantly railed against the supplementals as a threat (although once regulations were relaxed the scheduled carriers quickly overcame the supplementals).
- IATA (International Air Transport Association), then an international airline cartel, spent the 1960s/1970s fighting supplementals on the North Atlantic.
- Supplementals operated on the edge of legality:
- Up through the 1950s, some flew scheduled service well beyond what regulations permitted, some in open defiance of the CAB, earning an outlaw reputation.
- Charters captured over 30% of the transatlantic market in the 1970s. Regulations made it hard to access charters. Some consumers lied to qualify for low fare charters. When CAB enforcement agents detected this, they prosecuted the supplementals.
- Prominent personalities were connected to supplementals. For example:
- World Airways's owner Ed Daly flew in supplies and flew out orphans during the fall of South Vietnam.
- Future billionaire/Las Vegas titan Kirk Kerkorian made his first fortune selling Trans International Airlines.
- Spies owned one: in 1973 the CIA was exposed as owning supplemental Southern Air Transport.
History
[edit]Context
[edit]The Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938 instituted tight federal control over almost all US commercial air transport, initially by the Civil Aeronautics Authority, but that power passed to the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) in 1940. Airlines were required to be certificated by the CAB, but those flying scheduled service prior to the 1938 Act were grandfathered and the CAB certificated 19 domestic scheduled passenger airlines this way in 1939–1941. The 16 still flying after World War II were the domestic trunk carriers, and in many ways the CAB regulated the US airline industry in their interests. In the period 1943–1950, the CAB certificated another set of domestic scheduled airlines, the local service carriers (initially called feeder carriers), to fly routes to small cities. Competition was suppressed; the CAB determined ticket prices and what routes scheduled airlines flew.
Post-World War II demand overwhelmed the trunk carriers and the CAB, which was "lethargic" and "stunted" by the war. For instance, there was a month-long waiting list for air travel from Washington, DC to Dallas.[6] In 1946, Fortune magazine had a 12-page article about industry's struggle to handle massive post-war demand.[7]
The nonscheduled loophole
[edit]In theory, after World War II, the trunk carriers and (as they were certificated) the feeders were the only airlines providing US domestic scheduled service. But under a pre-war CAB exemption, nonscheduled carriers did not need a certificate, an allowance made so companies like fixed base operators (FBOs) could offer small aircraft charters without CAB approval. In August 1944, the CAB launched an investigation of the post-war role of nonskeds.[10] But as war ended, easy availability of war-surplus aircraft and war-trained pilots resulted in a flourishing of operators using the nonscheduled loophole. Some had transport-class aircraft like DC-3s, and some flew scheduled service. The study concluded May 1946 with the CAB coining the term "irregular" for such operators (versus "regular" service seen as typical of scheduled flights) and required them to register (essentially to gather data)[11] and subjected them to the parts of the 1938 Act that forbade unfair and deceptive practices.[12] The CAB also made an example of two nonskeds, finding they illegally engaged in scheduled service.[13][14]
The CAB issued a total of 162 "letters of registration" for "large" irregular carriers (those with transport-type equipment), as distinct from FBO-type operators for which the exemption was intended, finally freezing approvals in August 1948.[17] As of June 1948 (the date of its 1948 annual report) the CAB had issued 142 such letters, but only 109 of the carriers were active. The CAB issued another dozen letters to non-certificated pure cargo carriers.[18] By contrast, there were 42 certificated scheduled service carriers in operation.[19] The 142 registered irregular carriers had a total of 356 Douglas DC-3, DC-4 and Curtiss C-46 aircraft[18] between them, compared to over 1000 transport aircraft in domestic service and international service by scheduled operators, whose fleets also included some more modern types, e.g. Lockheed Constellations, Martin 2-0-2s, DC-6s and Convair 240s.[20] The CAB banned irregular carriers from international service without specific permission. The irregulars clustered in big markets like Puerto Rico (flying migrants to the mainland with fares as low as $45 southbound, $85 northbound vs certificated carrier fares of $133), transcontinental (Los Angeles to New York as low as $88 one way vs scheduled carrier $143) and flying people and freight to Alaska.[18]
Coach
[edit]Irregular carriers could charge low fares because of high-density seating and no-frills service. Seats were four-abreast in DC-3s and five-abreast in DC-4s (one more than normal) with reduced seat pitch, e.g. from 40 inches to 33. This became known as coach class. With interior reconfiguration, a DC-4 could carry as many as 80 people, up from 50–55.[23] It was generally conceded that irregular carriers invented coach class and the resulting demand expansion.[24] The CAB had to push certificated carriers to offer coach, sensitive to the fact that only the wealthy could afford first class.[25] Coach RPMs only exceeded first class (see Graph 2) in 1960, but even then the CAB was still having to push scheduled carriers to expand coach class.[26]
1949–1955: from death sentence to supplemental
[edit]From 1949 to 1955, the CAB swung between suppression and accommodation of irregular air carriers. In 1949, it eliminated the original blanket exemption that enabled irregular air carriers and required each to apply for an individual exemption. 95 did so, but 46 others fell by the wayside.[29] This was seen as a “death penalty” and by 1951, most of the surviving irregulars were either subject to an enforcement action or preliminary disapproval of their individual application.[30] The CAB also shut down specific offenders, like Standard Air Lines in 1949,[31] Viking Air Lines in 1950[32] and others for scheduled service and other violations. By 1958, the CAB had shut down 18 irregulars or supplementals this way.[33] But the irregulars had their supporters, like the Justice Department.[34] 1949 US Senate hearings credited irregulars with, among other things:
- Allowing those that could previously not afford it to fly[35]
- Playing a key role in the Berlin airlift, in contrast to the subsidized scheduled carriers[36]
- Low air freight costs allowing Alaskans to eat fresh fruits and vegetables. Alaska's governor was big fan.[37]
The CAB had trouble with irregularity: defining something in terms of a negative resulted in an "elusive and shifting concept."[38] The CAB tried several times to nail it down.[39] Even if individual carriers remained irregular (whatever that was), it was noted that a ticket agent representing many irregular carriers might cobble together effectively scheduled service on big routes. If the agent was independent, it was unclear the CAB could prevent this.[40]
The Korean War showed once again that the irregulars could be useful; they carried over 50% of the military charter airlift.[41] A 1949 appeals court ruling required the CAB give an irregular carrier a hearing before shutting it down, increasing the difficultly of possibly revoking dozens of carriers.[42] In 1951, the Senate again weighed in, lambasting the CAB for oppressing the irregulars while subsidizing "high-cost luxury air service for a small part of the population."[43] So the CAB rolled irregular carrier issues into an investigation, kicking the problem into the future, while, as discussed below, still pursuing specific offenders. When the investigation finished four years in the future (December 1955) the CAB was conciliatory. It acknowledged the contributions of the irregulars for things like coach class, Berlin and Korea. It renamed these carriers "supplemental" because it was now their role to provide supplemental capacity through unlimited domestic charters and the ability to fly up to 10 scheduled flights per month per city pair, effectively swapping "irregular" for "infrequent." It extended these rights to 49 supplementals through a new blanket exemption.[44]
1950s combines
[edit]A combine was a group of irregular carriers flying under the brand of a group-controlled ticket sales agency, often with common services (e.g. maintenance or accounting) provided by other group entities. The biggest combine was North American Airlines Group (1949–1957), where ultimately five irregular carriers flew under the "North American Airlines" name using a common pool of crews and aircraft. In the case of North American, the carriers were ostensibly independently owned and operated but in practice tightly controlled. Using multiple carriers allowed each to fly "irregularly", while together offering scheduled service. North American was effectively a rogue scheduled airline, highly profitable for its partners, who had the money to delay shutdown until 1957 through public relations, lobbying and litigation all the way to the US Supreme Court.
The CAB pursued three other combines:
- What the CAB called the Peninsular Group, which flew in the name (and sometimes livery) of, successively, Safeway, South East Airlines, and Atlantic Aircoach. The two main group carriers were Peninsular Air Transport and Aero Finance. It was a family firm: two brothers and a cousin owned/controlled the airlines, sisters owned the agencies, a nephew helped run them, etc. The CAB shut them in 1957.[27][48][28]
- The North Star Group, which operated under other names including Flying Irishman,[49] in which at least five carriers played a role over time: Caribbean American, Air America, Air Services, Central Air Transport and Paul Mantz Air Services.[50] On occasion combines swapped irregular carriers: for example, Central flew for North American before it flew for North Star and Paul Mantz would later fly for Skycoach, related below. The CAB started trying to shut down North Star in 1953.[51]
- The most persistent combine was Skycoach (other names it used included Transcontinental.[57]) Skycoach started as early as 1949.[58] Its two main carriers, Currey Air Transport and Great Lakes Airlines (no relation to the later regional airline of the same name), were shut down[59] in late 1961[60] after extensive litigation including multiple federal appeals court cases[61][62][63] and the US Supreme Court declining to take further appeals.[64] Skycoach used Monarch Air Service, in the early-mid 1950s[65] and the CAB also found Trans-Alaskan Airlines was under Skycoach control.[66] In 1961, Skycoach tried yet again by reviving two moribund carriers, Quaker City Airways and Paul Mantz Air Services (which earlier flew for North Star), renaming them Admiral Airways, and Paramount Airlines respectively. But 1962 legislation (discussed below) required all supplementals be recertificated by the CAB. There were no grandfather rights so the CAB simply declined in the cases of Admiral[67] and Paramount.[68]
Timetables survive from each of the four combines listed above.[69][70][71][72]
1953 snapshot
[edit]USD 000 | Military charter | Civil charter | Scheduled | Other | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Big four(1) | 22,442 | 4,217 | 3,718 | 433 | 30,810 |
Combines: | |||||
North American(2) | 423 | 0 | 9,268 | 785 | 10,476 |
Skycoach(3) | 634 | 128 | 2,743 | 145 | 3,650 |
North Star(4) | 196 | 213 | 2,173 | 220 | 2,802 |
Peninsular Group(5) | 555 | 137 | 1,522 | 7 | 2,221 |
Total combine | 1,808 | 478 | 15,706 | 1,157 | 19,149 |
37 other carriers | 10,837 | 1,769 | 4,716 | 2,747 | 20,069 |
Total | 35,087 | 6,464 | 24,140 | 4,337 | 70,028 |
In 1953, total irregular airline operating revenue was $70 million ($825 million in 2024 dollar terms). 55 irregular carriers reported non-zero revenue but one, Seaboard & Western, accounted for almost 20% of total irregular carrier revenue.[82] By comparison, the total US certificated (scheduled) carrier industry operating revenue was $1.317 billion, so irregular carrier revenue accounted for 5% of the joint certificated/irregular total. Included in that $1.317 billion was $13.5 million in scheduled airline charter revenue, little more than 1%.[91]
A breakdown of irregular airline revenue is shown in Table 1. Note:
- The irregulars had a significant scheduled business. These figures understate how large that was relative to what scheduled airlines would report because irregular carriers paid much larger commissions, as much as 45%, while scheduled carriers paid only 5%.[92] Pre-commission gross revenues (what consumers paid) were thus much greater per dollar of reported revenue for irregular carriers than for scheduled. Either way, however, irregular carrier scheduled business was small relative to the $1.044 billion that certificated carriers reported in scheduled flight revenue that year.[91]
- The combines together accounted for 65% of the irregular scheduled business, while North American alone accounted for 38% of irregular carrier scheduled revenue and 15% of total irregular carrier revenue.
- Seaboard & Western, Transocean, Overseas National Airways (ONA) and United States Overseas Airlines (USOA) accounted for almost 2/3 of the irregular military charter business.
1955–1962: legal crisis
[edit]Certificated carrier reaction to the CAB's 1955 creation of supplemental carriers, specifically the leeway to fly 10 flights/month on any given route, was "violent," according to Aviation Week. They sued to overturn it and were partially successful.[99] The CAB had continued to permit the operation of supplementals through its power of exemption. But that power required the CAB to show that certificating the supplementals would be an undue burden on these carriers, and the CAB had not done that.[100] So in January 1959 the CAB certificated the supplementals. Of 49 exempted in 1955, only 23 survived the 1959 certification process (with a further two to be decided), although appeals and litigation delayed the end of many carriers the CAB deemed unacceptable.[101]
That certification was overturned April 1960:[102]
- The CAB could not legally regulate frequency. So the limit of 10 frequencies per route per month was illegal.
- Certificates were legally required to specify end and intermediate points of routes. Making endpoints any two cities in the country (as it effectively was for supplementals) frustrated the clear intent of the legislation.
Congress intervened with an interim bill allowing the status quo while it considered a solution.[103] Senate and House split; the House wanted to limit the supplementals to charters, the Senate to let them keep limited scheduled authority. In November 1961, a notorious crash (discussed further below) by a financially-shaky supplemental, Imperial Airlines, swung momentum towards the House, and in July 1962, Public Law 87-528 turned supplementals into pure charter carriers after a two-year transition. The law required supplementals to go through another certification, at the end of which, in 1966, only 13 were left.[104] The bill also allowed scheduled cargo airlines to also offer passenger charters, increasing competition for the supplementals.[105][106]
1960 military charter changes
[edit]As Graph 3 shows, the military was the largest revenue source for 1950s supplementals. For example, in 1956, ten supplementals supported DEW Line construction in the arctic.[120] Prior to 1960, the military awarded charter contracts by competitive bid and accepted bids from Part 45 carriers, airlines not subject to CAB regulation because they were not common carriers. Part 45s could undercut CAB carriers so the CAB was forced to allow its carriers to also bid, making military charters a rare competitive free-for-all in a system that otherwise suppressed competition.[121] For instance, in 1959, the Military Air Transportation Service (MATS), the governing military agency, invited 93 airlines to bid for contracts.[122] In the same year, Overseas National Airways won over half the international military contract dollars for 1960, stripping Pan Am and Trans World Airlines (TWA) of their contracts.[123]
MATS ran its own scheduled flights with military transports. The airlines, and others, believed the military should not provide routine air transport.[124] In February 1960, the US Department of Defense (DOD) published a report endorsed by President Eisenhower: MATS was to reduce flights in favor of airlines and only "air carriers" per the 1958 Federal Aviation Act were to fly military charters. This was the definition of a CAB-regulated air carrier, so it excluded Part 45s. Further, contracts were to go to carriers with militarily useful aircraft.[125] The aim was to renew the country's commercial cargo fleet, viewed as dangerously inadequate.[126] With Part 45s excuded, the CAB ended competitive bidding and set uniform military charter rates at significantly higher levels, in particular, ones profitable for scheduled carriers.[127]
With price no longer a factor, DOD allocated contracts by an airline's participation in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF), a pool of airliners the military can tap in emergency. The military assigned "mobilization values" to aircraft in CRAF based on speed (favoring jets), capacity, utility and range. DOD liked long-range convertible jets that could carry passengers or cargo.[128] The highest-rated narrowbody was a "stretch" convertible DC-8-63CF, which had a higher rating than a passenger 747.[129] By the late 1960s/early 1970s, seven supplementals flew the DC-8-63CF or the closely-related DC-8-61CF: American Flyers,[130] Capitol,[131] ONA,[132] Saturn,[133] Trans International,[134] Universal[135] and World.[136] Standard Airways cited lack of convertible jets and resulting inability to get much military business as a factor in its 1969 collapse.[137] Of course, in 1960, no supplemental flew jets. In fact, even in 1964, the supplementals still had only six long-range jets between them, against 427 for scheduled carriers, giving them a huge edge.[138]
1961 Imperial Airlines crash
[edit]In November 1961, supplemental Imperial Airlines crashed a Lockheed Constellation, killing all 74 soldiers aboard. The investigation showed the crew was incompetent and put the safety record of the supplementals in the spotlight, revealing it to be 30 times worse than that of scheduled carriers. DOD came under pressure to tighten standards, and launched its own airline inspections. Some supplementals that failed inspections were small, like Airline Transport Carriers (dba California Hawaiian), but among those that failed was also United States Overseas Airlines (USOA), one of the largest supplementals. This contributed significantly to USOA's 1964 demise. And a 1963 non-fatal crash at Standard Airways surfaced maintenance issues leading DOD to crack down, contributing to 1964 bankruptcy.
1965 vs 1955: mortality, new leaders, substantial profitability for some
[edit]CAB enforcement actions against combines, the impact of new military charter allocation rules, the DOD's crackdown after the 1961 Imperial Airlines crash and the shifting legal status of supplementals, including recertifications, all contributed to a big reduction in the ranks of supplementals from 49 in 1955 to 13 by the end of 1965,[142] this number also reflecting the November 1965 merger of AAXICO Airlines into Saturn Airways (known as All-American Airways in 1955).[143] These 13 were not all in good health: the future of three was in doubt, with operations suspended or only recently resumed.[144] At year end 1965, only 11 supplementals were operating but this returned to 13 at the end of 1966.[104] The 1965 lead carriers by revenue were also completely different from those of 1955. Of the top five supplementals in 1955, one (Seaboard & Western) became a scheduled cargo carrier[145] while the other four were out of business by 1965.[146] In 1965 the three largest supplementals were World Airways, Zantop Air Transport and Trans International Airlines (TIA).[147] In 1955, Los Angeles Air Service (the original name of TIA) had the 18th and World Airways the 19th largest revenues.[146] Zantop wasn't even a supplemental in 1955, but became one in 1962 by merging with moribund supplemental Coastal Air Lines, known as Coastal Cargo Company in 1955. Zantop was previously a Part 45 carrier.[148]
Supplemental air carriers of year-end 1965:[142]
The 13 supplementals of 1965 included two new entrants, Vance International Airways and Purdue Aeronautics Corporation, (a Purdue University subsidiary), certificated in 1960[149] and 1961[150] respectively. Another exit from 1955 ranks was Trans Caribbean, which became a scheduled passenger airline in 1957.[151] See below for supplemental New entrants and Graduates during the CAB era.
TIA and World leveraged the new military charter rules. As previously noted, awards depended on the number and quality of aircraft committed to CRAF, especially jets. In 1962, TIA was the first supplemental to operate jets[152] and World followed in 1963.[153] Jets gave them priority access to Vietnam-generated (see next section) military business. Even before World had jets, it made a substantial commitment to CRAF, helping to secure military business.[154] The CAB set military rates so even high-cost scheduled carriers could make money. Supplemental costs were far lower,[155] so World and TIA made high military charter profits. For example, from 1965 to 1966, World's revenues increased from $33 to $50 million (military accounting for 78% and 75% of charter revenue respectively).[156] Its 1965 operating margin was 36%, dropping slightly to 33% in 1966. World went public in 1966, owner Ed Daly's remaining 80% stake was worth $280 million (over $2.7 billion in 2024 dollars), a high return on the $50,000 he spent to buy World in 1950. Not all supplementals were so lucky. In 1966, four of 13 supplementals made a loss and two broke even.[153]
Some big names failed between 1955 and 1965. Transocean stopped operating early 1960 after years of high losses. As previously related, USOA failed a military inspection in the wake of the Imperial Airlines crash. Its finances deteriorated and the CAB shut it in 1964 after it failed to pay employees. Overseas National Airways entered bankruptcy in 1963 but was revived as effectively a new company by an investor group at the end of 1965, with jets in service by summer 1966. Capitol Airways was one supplemental near the top of the industry at both ends of the 1955–1965 period. From 1956 to 1960 it was one of the top four supplementals by revenue.[157][158][159][160] In 1965, Capitol was still number four,[147] having put its first jet in service in 1963.[161]
1960s Vietnam bubble
[edit]The 1960s saw an enormous military charter boom as a result of the combination of Vietnam-driven military charter demand, the transfer to the airlines of volume previously carried the military's own flights and the rise in rates from the end of competitive bidding. From fiscal 1960 to fiscal 1969, DOD international RPMs increased over eight times. Moreover, while in 1960, charter flights supplied only 48.5% of international military RPMs (the balance supplied by the military's own flights), in 1969 that proportion jumped to 93.9%.[162] However, scheduled carriers, by dedicating much larger jet fleets to CRAF, grabbed most of the business. For instance, in 1968 Pan Am had 108 jets enrolled in CRAF, twice that of any other airline, and its fleet included 32 convertible Boeing 707-321Cs.[163] In Fiscal 1968, Pan Am, by itself, received $99.8 million for international military charters, almost as much as the entire supplemental industry, which received $101.7 million.[164] Driven by this military charter bounty, charter RPMs hit an all time high of 18.5% of total US airline industry RPMs in 1969. Of that, scheduled US carriers took over 60% (see Graph 1).
After 1969, military charters diminished substantially, with 1975 military charter RPMs down 74% from the 1969 peak. Cargo dropped even faster, because the US military took delivery of C-141 Starlifters from 1965 and C-5A Galaxies from 1970, which it put to work hauling military cargo.[165][166] Military charter cargo ton-miles (one ton of freight transported one mile) in 1975 were down to just 5% of the 1967 peak.[162]
Civil charters
[edit]From the late 1960s, the transatlantic became the key civil market for supplementals, as discussed below.
Context: IATA and Europe
[edit]In the 1960s, jet aircraft economics allowed transatlantic air travel to increase dramatically,[167] with one-way passengers rising from 3 million in 1963 to 11 million in 1971.[168] Scheduled fares were even higher than in the US. For instance, in 1971, the standard New York-Paris economy fare was 1/3 higher than New York-Honolulu, which was over 1,200 miles further.[169] IATA, the international scheduled airline club and then a cartel,[170][171] set international fares. The CAB provided IATA a waiver from US antitrust law.[172] Most governments backed IATA with air service agreements that required IATA fares,[173] plus most IATA carriers were government owned[174] or controlled.[175] In 1973, IATA carriers carried 94% of international scheduled traffic.[175] Even most notable non-IATA carriers, like Aeroflot, used IATA fares, with only a few non-IATA rebels charging lower prices, like Loftleidir Icelandic.[176] Real competition came from charters, which carried 28% of international traffic in 1972 with prices set by supply-and-demand.[176] Charters cost less than half the usual IATA scheduled fares.[177] Competition between IATA and charter carriers was complex. Some prominent IATA carriers had non-IATA charter subsidiaries (e.g. Lufthansa's Condor subsidiary, or Air France's Air Charter International).[178] And as discussed below, many prominent IATA carriers also engaged in wide-scale illegal rebates of IATA scheduled fares. On the Atlantic, charter share rose from 16% in 1963 to 32% in 1971,[179] but in some segments it was far higher: in 1969, over 50% of US-Germany flights, and over 80% of California-Germany flights, were charters.[180]
Key market
[edit]Transatlantic passengers on the supplementals using affinity charters (the main type, discussed below) grew rapidly from 32,000 in 1963 to 781,000 in 1969.[181] From 1966, six supplementals had Atlantic rights,[182] with Atlantic charters accounting for 43% of their civil revenue in 1968,[183] at which time affinity charters were 93% of the total.[184] Supplemental transatlantic passengers then doubled from 1968 to 1969[181] (also the first year that supplemental civil charter revenue exceeded military).[185] In 1974, the Atlantic accounted for 99% of ONA's civil revenue, 71% of Capitol's and 83% of Saturn's.[186] By 1976, the CAB said the Atlantic accounted for 75% of all supplemental civil operations.[187] Supplementals without Atlantic authority mostly died: Standard (1969), Purdue (1971), Modern (1975) and McCulloch (1977, successor to Vance International). Those with Atlantic authority mostly survived: Capitol, ONA (voluntarily liquidated 1978 as discussed below), Saturn, TIA, and World. The exceptions were Johnson Flying Service (no Atlantic rights but sold to Evergreen Helicopters in 1975), Southern Air Transport (no rights, but a CIA-subsidiary until 1973, then not a supplemental thru 1977) and Universal (successor to Zantop), which bought American Flyers in 1971 for its Atlantic rights.[188] The CAB tried to strip Universal of Atlantic rights in 1972 and while President Nixon prevented it,[189] the uncertainty had already killed Universal by cutting it off from finance.[190]
Affinity and other charters
[edit]The supplementals were limited in the kinds of charters they could offer. Until the early 1970s these were:[191]
- Affinity (or pro-rata) charter: sponsored for members by a club or organization (that existed for purposes other than travel). Passengers had to be a member for at least six months prior. The cost of a charter was shared, pro-rata, among those flying, so price per person depended on how many passengers flew.[192] From 1964, organizations could share an affinity charter.[193]
- Single entity: for instance, a corporation charters a flight to Europe to reward top salespeople.
- Study trip: a charter in conjunction with education, e.g. students studying in Europe for the summer.
- From 1966 the CAB allowed inclusive tour charters (ITC)[194] but required three overnight stops at least 50 miles apart with high minimum spend/minimum stay requirements. The US tour market remained underdeveloped: In 1972, only 150,000 Americans traveled on ITCs compared to 12 million Europeans.[195]
Affinity charters were dominant until the last years of the regulated era,[196] but had many problems. They were discriminatory;[197] consumers were excluded if not a member of a "charterworthy" club (the term of art) and such members tended to be wealthier.[198] Charter prices were much lower: in 1965, a typical New York-London charter fare was 20% lower than the lowest fare available on TWA or Pan Am.[199] People lied to get onto affinity charters; violations were "rampant," with an active gray and black market.[200][201] ONA's CEO noted even the clergy would lie to fly such charters because the CAB was withholding low fares from the public for no good reason.[198] In 1972, the CAB created the Travel Group Charter (TGC) as an affinity replacement. Any group of 40 could use a TGC, but the CAB ringed the TGC with so many conditions it was hardly used,[202] unlike the simpler Advance Booking Charter (ABC) created in Canada and Europe in the same timeframe.[203] In 1975, charter type shares for supplementals on the Atlantic were 73% affinity, 13% ITC, 9% single entity, 1% TGC.[204]
CAB enforcement
[edit]The CAB vigorously pursued enforcement against supplementals. Supplementals required passengers to sign statements confirming they met charter requirements[205][201] but the CAB held airlines, not passengers, responsible for violations, issuing fines, cease-and-desist orders and threats to revoke certification.[206] A CAB official admitted over half its enforcement activity was directed against charters.[207] Yet scheduled carriers engaged in illegal activity related to scheduled flights, but attracted no CAB sanction. In the early 1970s, there were a half billion dollars in annual illegal transatlantic scheduled fare rebates, but the CAB turned a blind eye until a US Department of Justice investigation resulted in fines and consent decrees from 19 airlines in 1975, including Pan Am, TWA and most European flag carriers (e.g. Air France, Lufthansa, British Airways, KLM, etc).[208] The CAB's aggressive stance on possible illegal charter activity contrasted with its slow response to consumer complaints against scheduled carriers, one case taking eight years to resolve.[209] The CAB imposed onerous charter overhead. Over 60 pages of filings were required per charter flight. Changes required refiling rather than amendment and changes too close to the date of the flight could force cancellation. Another indication of the focus of CAB bureaucracy were CAB filing fees. Although charters amounted to a few percent of US airline revenues, charter filings accounted for 24% of total CAB filing fees.[210]
1969 to 1975: regulatory tightening
[edit]From 1969 to early 1975, US airline regulation tightened. The US industry suffered a downturn starting 1969. Widebody aircraft deliveries led to a capacity glut and combined with an economic downturn and substantial labor cost increases, led to poor results. The 1971 annual report of the Air Transport Association (the scheduled airlines club, in 2024 known as Airlines for America) said 1970 was a year of "serious financial depression." It also put part of the blame on supplementals.[211] The 1973 oil crisis hit hard, with increased fuel prices adding $1 billion to 1974 scheduled airline costs of $14 billion.[212] Starting 1970, the CAB pursued an unannounced route moratorium, no longer responding to new route requests.[213] The CAB also coordinated capacity reductions among scheduled carriers.[214] In 1973, Nixon appointed Robert D. Timm as CAB chair,[215] who pushed for a 12% industry return on investment[216] and the CAB refused any fare reduction that threatened this goal.[217] The CAB was determined to limit low fares: from 1971 to 1974, 2/3 of the CAB's field investigative efforts were directed towards ensuring low-fares weren't breaking the law.[218]
In 1973–1974 the CAB pushed supplementals to coordinate Atlantic pricing with scheduled carriers. When negotiations between supplementals and IATA broke down, the CAB imposed minimum charter prices ("guidelines") as part of a plan to help financially-distressed Pan Am.[219] Ensuring Pan Am's survival was a Nixon administration priority.[220] Atlantic charter prices had always been set by the market[221] and the CAB had no right to set prices internationally, but the CAB had the right to investigate and promised to investigate charter rates below the minimums. The Department of Justice believed this to be illegal.[222] Senator Ted Kennedy, with the assistance of future Supreme Court justice Stephen Breyer, held hearings on this topic in November 1974.[223][224] The Kennedy hearings on CAB conduct that started February 1975 were seen as kicking off a swing towards deregulation that culminated in the 1978 Airline Deregulation Act, but Kennedy saw the November 1974 hearings on transatlantic charter pricing as starting the process.[225] The supplementals challenged the CAB in court and got a stay.[226] Meanwhile, Timm was caught vacationing with scheduled airline CEOs, paid for by aircraft manufacturers[227] and President Ford did not reappoint him as CAB Chair for 1975.[228] The CAB dropped the minimum charter price policy February 1975.[229]
1975: fall of South Vietnam
[edit]World Airways made headlines at least twice during the fall of South Vietnam in 1975. One was the last flight out of Da Nang on 29 March 1975, with thousands of desperate people rushing a World Boeing 727, injuring many including CEO Ed Daly. The damaged aircraft took off with hundreds of people on board, including in the cargo compartment.[230] The other was World's activities airlifting Vietnamese orphans, including outfitting a 747 as a flying hospital, bringing hundreds of children to the US[231] (part of a wider effort known as Operation Babylift). As previously mentioned, the supplementals were deeply involved in Vietnam through military charters. In Fiscal 1969, World's international military charter revenues were $52 million (over $400 million in 2024 terms), the third largest that year after Pan Am ($65 million) and Continental ($55 million).[232]
1975 to 1978: regulatory relaxation
[edit]The regulatory pendulum now swung the other direction. In 1975, following the Kennedy hearings, President Ford appointed pro-competition CAB chair John E. Robson. This was followed by President Carter's 1977 appointment of Alfred E. Kahn, leading to the 1978 Airline Deregulation Act.
In autumn 1975, the CAB approved European-style one-stop inclusive tour charters (first impacting summer season 1976)[233] followed in autumn 1976 by European-style Advance Booking Charters (ABCs).[234] Other than being booked well in advance through a tour company, ABCs were little different than a scheduled flight.[235] Charters boomed in 1976, especially to places like Hawaii[236] and Las Vegas.[237] Even greater success in 1977 with the new ABC seemed certain. The New York Times[238] and others[239] ran stories about how the future of travel belonged to charters. But in spring 1977, American Airlines (then mostly a domestic airline) introduced Supersaver fares, designed to fill empty seats with charter-type customers.[240] US scheduled carriers had lots of empty seats: in the early 1970s the CAB had a policy of targeting 55% load factors, up from 50%.[241] By the end of that summer, it was clear Supersavers were destroying domestic charters.[242] However, the new charters did succeed in dislodging affinity charters as the prevalent type of charter.[196]
In September 1977, British charter carrier Laker Airways started Skytrain service from New York to London.[243] Skytrain was a no-reservation scheduled flight at a charter fare, something Laker had wanted since 1971.[244] Scheduled airlines responded with low fares of their own.[245] In the six months ending March 1978, the London-New York market expanded by 39%; the number of low fares (including charters) sold across the Atlantic exploded by over 300% in the first quarter of 1978 over the prior year.[246] Unsurprisingly, this hurt charters: in the first six months of 1978, New York-London supplemental traffic declined 42% from the year prior.[247] In 1978, to help keep the charter carriers in the game, the CAB created a "public charter," with basically no requirements: no advance purchase, no minimum group size, no minimum spend, no minimum stay, etc.[248] But supplementals needed to price below scheduled fares to attract customers. In early 1978, the required spread was estimated as $50 round trip between London and New York. In winter 1977/78 and 1978/79, the lowest New York-London scheduled fares were at or below this spread, approaching charter levels.[249]
Deregulation: end of the supplementals
[edit]The four remaining Atlantic-flying supplementals (Capitol, ONA, TIA, World) reacted in very different ways to approaching deregulation. By the end of 1978, Capitol, TIA and World Airways applied for and received authority for scheduled Atlantic service.[250][251] By contrast, ONA chose to cease operating September 1978, the culmination of failed diversification, poor financial results and three aircraft crashes within a 16 month period from November 1975 through March 1977, including the loss of two widebody DC-10s within two months. In the face of regulatory uncertainty, ONA liquidated outside bankruptcy, selling aircraft into a strong market.
In October 1978, President Carter signed the Airline Deregulation Act, which was literally the end for supplementals. The Act replaced the word "supplemental" with "charter"[252] (at least for economic purposes; see Legacy below) and ushered the US industry into deregulation as of 1 January 1979. The Act immediately diminished the CAB's powers and further stripped its authority in stages until the agency's end date of 1 January 1985.[253] Until then, the CAB spoke of charter air carriers, not supplementals. For instance, the CAB Handbook of Aviation Statistics Supplement for 1977 and 1978, published 1979,[254] replaced almost all instances of the word "supplemental" with "charter" versus the earlier edition covering 1975 and 1976, published 1977.[255] Effective 1981, the CAB abandoned the old categories of trunk, local service, charter, etc and simply grouped airlines by revenue.[256]
For a snapshot of the supplementals in 1978, see 1978 survivors below.
Legacy
[edit]No surviving supplemental made a successful long-term transition to scheduled service after 1979 deregulation. Capitol tried scheduled service but shut down in 1984. TIA also offered scheduled service, but when its parent put it up for sale in 1986, the airline (then called Transamerica) was worth more dead than alive. World tried scheduled service but reverted to charter and cargo. Rich International lasted until 1996, mostly as a passenger charter carrier. Southern Air Transport and Zantop International lasted until the late 1990s and early 2000s respectively as cargo carriers. Evergreen became a sizeable carrier, mainly freight, but shut in 2013. In 2014, World was the last former supplemental to cease operations.
The most durable legacy of the irregular/supplemental airlines may be coach class. The supplementals also got some credit for inspiring airline deregulation. The Kennedy subcommittee report concentrated far more on intrastate airlines than supplementals,[257] but one academic paper of the time credited the supplementals as an "agent of change."[196]
While US regulations regarding economic aspects of airlines use the word "charter" (e.g. 14 CFR Part 380—Public Charters), "supplemental" is still present in regulations concerning operational matters (e.g. 14 CFR Part 121—Operating Requirements: Domestic, Flag, and Supplemental Operations). Thus the Federal Aviation Administration, which oversees airline operations, still speaks of supplementals.
As of 2024, the US Department of Transportion still lists affinity and single entity charters as approved types of charters that an airline can offer, along with public charters.[258]
As of 2024 charters are a very small niche within the US airline industry. US Department of Transportation data shows charters accounted for about half a percent of US airline industry revenue passenger miles in 2023.[259]
Supplemental air carrier mortality
[edit]Summary
[edit]As described in 1978 survivors below, only seven supplementals survived to the end of the regulated era in 1978, representing nine original irregular or supplemental carriers (accounting for two mergers). As previously mentioned, the CAB provided 162 letters of registration to large irregular carriers and another dozen to pure cargo irregular carriers. As discussed in New Entrants below, the CAB added net five more supplemental carriers over time. So the total number of irregular/supplemental carriers created was 162+12+5 = 179. Further, as described in Graduates below, the CAB certificated a net ten irregular or supplemental carriers as scheduled passenger (three) or cargo (seven) carriers, which can thus be excluded. So the survival rate can be seen as nine out of (179 - 10) = 169 or 5.3%. The mortality rate of irregular/supplemental carriers under CAB regulation was therefore well over 90%.
Few CAB-regulated scheduled operators died. The CAB sought to boost weak scheduled carriers by giving them desirable routes.[260] If such a carrier got into serious trouble, the CAB would let them merge with a stronger scheduled line.[261] The ones that did perish were minor.[262] Among the original scheduled carriers grandfathered under the 1938 Act, the only one that ceased operations rather than merge was tiny two-aircraft Wilmington-Catalina Airline (later known as Catalina Air Transport).[263] Among international carriers there was one-aircraft Samoan Airlines[264] and no-aircraft Uraba, Medellin and Central Airways (a Pan Am subsidiary that Pan Am requested to shut down).[265] Oddball international carrier Resort Airlines, with scheduled authority limited to flying all-expense paid tours, went out of business in 1960. In the early days of local service carriers the CAB declined to renew the temporary certificates of Florida Airways,[266] Mid-West Airlines[267] and E.W. Wiggins Airways.[268] A later exception was former air taxi operator TAG Airlines, certificated by the CAB for scheduled service on a single city pair, only to suffer a crash[269] that put it out of business.[270]
A broader exception were the CAB-certificated scheduled freight carriers, where mortality was substantial: four out of eight went out of business (Airnews, U. S. Airlines, Aerovias Sud Americana, Slick Airways). All eight scheduled freight carriers were former irregular air carriers. For details see the articles for these carriers.
1978 survivors
[edit]In 1978, the last year of the regulated era, the CAB listed ten supplementals, shown in Table 2. But Modern Air Transport ceased operation in 1975, McCulloch in 1977 and ONA in September 1978. The remaining seven represented nine original carriers among them, given that Saturn (originally All American Airways) merged into TIA in 1976 and AAXICO merged into Saturn in 1965.
The 1978 supplementals were modest. The 1978 supplemental sector revenue of $530 million[271] accounted for just 2.3% of total 1978 US CAB-regulated airline industry revenues (scheduled plus supplemental) of $23.4 billion[272] (25 years earlier the industry revenue share of the irregular air carriers was 5%—see 1953 snapshot). The military accounted for only 23% of supplemental revenue in 1978.[271] Only TIA's revenues of $231 million (about $1.1 billion in 2024 dollars) were comparable to some of the smaller domestic scheduled airlines like the local service carriers. TIA had bigger 1978 revenues than Ozark ($230 million), Piedmont ($206 million), Southern ($189 million) and Texas International ($181 million),[273] but not even half the revenues of the smallest trunk carrier, National Airlines ($636.4 million).[274]
Airline[275] | Op revenue (USD mil)[276] |
Fleet (bold indicates jet type) |
---|---|---|
Capitol International | 87.0 | 12 DC-8[277] |
Evergreen International | 40.9 | 6 DC-8, 3 DC-9, 4 Lockheed Electra, 7 CV-580[278] |
McCulloch International | 1.2 | (1)[279] |
Modern Air Transport | (2) | |
Overseas National | 28.3 | (1)[280] |
Rich International | 2.9 | 2 DC-6, 3 C-46[281] |
Southern Air Transport | N/A | 2 Lockheed L-100-20, 1 Lockheed L-100-30[282] |
Trans International | 231.2 | 3 DC-10, 14 DC-8, 11 Lockheed L-100-30, 9 Lockheed Electra[283] |
World Airways | 126.6 | 3 DC-10, 5 DC-8[284] |
Zantop International | 10.3 | 5 DC-8, 16 Lockheed Electra, 11 DC-6, 14 CV-640[285] |
New entrants and re-entrants
[edit]The CAB certificated five completely new supplementals from 1960 onward:
- Vance International Airways certificated in 1960.[149]
- Purdue Aeronautics Corporation, subsidiary of Purdue University, certificated in 1961.[150]
- Interstate Airmotive, a small St Louis-based DC-3 operator, certificated in 1968[286] but ceased operations in 1972.[287]
- Rich International Airways certificated in 1977.[288]
- Zantop International Airlines, a separate carrier from Zantop Air Transport, certificated in 1977.[289]
The CAB allowed one carrier to become a supplemental by merging with an existing supplemental:
- Zantop Air Transport, a Part 45 carrier, merged with moribund supplemental carrier Coastal Air Lines.[148] Zantop Air Transport (ZAT) and Zantop International Airlines (ZIA) were separate carriers started by the same brothers in different decades, ZAT in the 1950s, ZIA in the 1970s.
Lastly, three carriers lost their status as a supplemental but later regained it:
- California Eastern Aviation lost and then, in 1959, regained its supplemental status.[290]
- AAXICO Airlines recertificated as a supplemental in 1962 after being a scheduled cargo carrier (see Graduates).
- Southern Air Transport was sold by the CIA in 1973, and as part of that process gave up its supplemental status. In 1977, no longer owned by the CIA, it regained it.[289]
Graduates
[edit]Three certificated scheduled passenger carriers started as irregular or supplemental carriers:
- Trans-Pacific Airlines, later known as Aloha Airlines, held a letter of registration as an irregular carrier[291] before being certificated as a scheduled "territorial airline" in the then-territory of Hawaii in 1948.[292]
- The CAB certificated Resort Airlines as a international scheduled carrier in 1949, with scheduled service limited to all-expense-paid tours known as skycruises.[293]
- In 1957 the CAB certificated Trans Caribbean Airways as a territorial carrier to Puerto Rico.[151]
All eight US scheduled cargo airlines of the CAB era started as irregular air carriers. But AAXICO reverted to a supplemental, so net conversions were seven:
- In 1949, the CAB certificated four irregulars, Flying Tiger Line, Slick Airways, U. S. Airlines and Airnews, as scheduled domestic cargo airlines.[294]
- Airnews started by flying newspapers from San Antonio in February 1946 for its parent, a newspaper publisher.[295] The CAB certificated Airnews for a combined air-truck operation within Texas. In 1951 Airnews turned in its certificate. The public was uninterested in the truck component, which the CAB viewed as intrinsic to the certificate, so there was no point in continuing.[296]
- In 1951, Riddle Airlines won CAB certification to fly scheduled cargo from the US east coast to Puerto Rico.[297] The airline was later known as Airlift International.[298]
- Aerovias Sud Americana (dba ASA International Airlines) pioneered Latin American scheduled cargo after being certificated in 1952.[299]
- In 1955, Seaboard & Western was certificated as an international scheduled cargo airline.[145]
- In 1955, the CAB certificated AAXICO Airlines to fly part of the former U. S. Airlines domestic scheduled cargo franchise.[300] But AAXICO reverted to being a supplemental in 1962,[301] the sole case of an airline becoming scheduled and later reverting to supplemental/irregular.
See also
[edit]- List of defunct airlines of the United States
- History of non-scheduled airlines in the United States
References
[edit]- ^ 1951 Annual Report of the Civil Aeronautics Board (Report). p. 69. hdl:2027/pst.000067708017.
- ^ New England Air Express v. Civil Aeron. Board, 194 F.2d 894 (D.C. Cir. 1952).
- ^ United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, April Term 1955, North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Number 12,858 Volume I. Washington, DC: Wilson - Epes Printing Co. 1955. pp. 651, 704, 707.
- ^ "American Air Transport and Flight School, Inc., Revocation Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 16. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 294–321. July 1952 – February 1953. hdl:2027/mdp.39015023950119.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 450–456.
- ^ Ritchie, Donald A. (Autumn 1980). "Reforming the Regulatory Process: Why James Landis Changed His Mind". The Business History Review. 54 (3): 288. doi:10.2307/3114241. JSTOR 3114241.
- ^ "What's Wrong with the Airlines". Fortune. 34 (2): 73. August 1946.
- ^ Air Transport Associates v. Civil Aeron. Bd. (cert den 1953), 199 F.2d 181 (D.C. Cir. 1952).
- ^ "Air Transport Associates, Inc., Enforcement Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 14. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 805–817. May–December 1951. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360606.
- ^ "Non-Scheduled Air Service Study Opens". Aviation News. 2 (2): 53. 7 August 1944. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ "CAB Getting Non-Scheduled Data for Economic Controls". Aviation News. 6 (7): 13. 12 August 1946. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ "Investigation of Nonscheduled Air Services". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 6. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 1049–1059. July 1944 – May 1946. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657786.
- ^ "Page Airways, Inc., Investigation". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 10. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 1061–1070. January–November 1949. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657786.
- ^ "Trans-Marine Airlines, Inc., Investigation of Activities". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 10. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 1071–1077. January–November 1949. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657786.
- ^ "Air America, Inc.—Enforcement Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 18. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 393–418. October 1953 – July 1954. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360564.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 438.
- ^ Civil Aeronautics Board Reports to Congress, Fiscal 1968 (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1968. p. 120. hdl:2027/pst.000067708055.
- ^ a b c Civil Aeronautics Board Annual Report (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1948. pp. 24–25. hdl:2027/pst.000067708000.
- ^ CABAnnual 1948, p. 7.
- ^ CABAnnual 1948, p. 60.
- ^ Air Permits Cancelled, Los Angeles Evening Citizen-News, 28 January 1956
- ^ "Caribbean-American Lines, Inc., Enforcement Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 17. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 1154–1158. March–September 1953. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360572.
- ^ Transcript of Record: 237 F.2d 209 (D.C. Cir. 1956). Washington, DC: Wilson - Epes Printing Co. 1955. pp. 42–43.
- ^ "CAB Should Order A Skycoach Investigation". Aviation Week. 49 (25): 50. 20 December 1948. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ "Air Coach Snag". Aviation Week. 55 (24): 16. 10 December 1951. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ "Carriers Dispute Board's Coach Stand". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 72 (11): 38. 14 March 1960. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ a b "Aero-Peninsular Compliance Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 24. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 469–516. September 1956 – March 1957. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658073.
- ^ a b c Large Irregular 1959, p. 356–366.
- ^ "95 Nonskeds File for Exemption". Aviation Week. 51 (2): 41. 11 July 1949. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Role 1951, p. 164–165.
- ^ "Standard Air Lines, Inc., Noncertificated Operations". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 10. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 486–510. January–November 1949. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657588.
- ^ "Viking Airliners, Aero-Van Express Corporation, and Viking Air Transport Company, Inc.—Non-Certificated Operations". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 11. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 401–430. December 1949 – August 1950. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657638.
- ^ Investigation of National Defense Phase II: Hearings Before the United States House Committee on Armed Services, Special Subcommittee No. 4 (Armed Services), Eighty-Fifth Congress, Second Session, Pursuant to H. Res. 67 (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1958. p. 115. hdl:2027/umn.31951d021564820.
- ^ "Nonskeds Ask Aid of Justice Dept". Aviation Week. 50 (10): 39. 7 March 1949. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Hearings 1949, p. 281.
- ^ Hearings 1949, p. 846–847.
- ^ Air-Line Industry Investigation: Hearings Before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, United States Senate, Eighty-first Congress, First Session, Pursuant to S. Res. 50 (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 1197. hdl:2027/umn.31951d03505219e.
- ^ Netterville, Victor S. (1949). "The Regulation of Irregular Air Carriers: A History". Journal of Air Law and Commerce. 16 (4): 419.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link) - ^ Large Irregular 1955, p. 942–948.
- ^ Netterville 1949, p. 426.
- ^ Large Irregular 1955, p. 860.
- ^ Standard Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 177 F.2d 18 (D.C. Cir. 1949).
- ^ "Senate View". Aviation Week. 55 (3): 72. 16 July 1951. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ "Large Irregular Air Carrier Investigation". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 22. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 838–972. November–December 1955. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360515.
- ^ Quarterly Report of Air Carrier Financial Statistics (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. 31 March 1959. p. inside back cover. hdl:2027/mdp.39015026081490.
- ^ Quarterly Report of Air Carrier Financial Statistics (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. 30 September 1959. pp. 76, 78. hdl:2027/mdp.39015026081490.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 257–258,426–429,438–445.
- ^ "Southeast Airlines Agency, Inc., et al., Compliance Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 25. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 89–108. April–September 1957. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658024.
- ^ Airline Res 1953, p. 127.
- ^ a b Large Irregular 1959, p. 426–445.
- ^ "Airline Reservations, Inc., Enforcement Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 18. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 114–129. October 1953 – July 1954. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658420.
- ^ ATA Irregular 1954, p. B-37.
- ^ "Meteor Air Transport, Exemption". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 25. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 771–773. April–September 1957. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658024.
- ^ "Meteor Air Transport, Inc., Control and Interlocking Relationships". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 26. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 219–227. October 1957 – June 1958. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360473.
- ^ Company Gear To Be Sold At Public Auction, Hackensack (NJ) Record, 4 April 1958
- ^ "Large Irregular Air Carrier Investigation, Reopened". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 31. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 914–915. May–September 1960. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657679.
- ^ GLA Enforcement 1959, p. 1227.
- ^ "Target Tabor". Aviation Week. 51 (20): 54. 14 November 1949. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ "Great Lakes Airlines, Inc., et al., Enforcement Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 29. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 1197–1265. March–September 1959. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360440.
- ^ Non-Skeds Shut Down Just Shed Their Skins, Bounce Back, Memphis Press-Scimitar, 13 December 1961
- ^ Great Lakes Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 291 F.2d 354 (9th Cir. 1961).
- ^ Great Lakes Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 293 F.2d 153 (D.C. Cir. 1961).
- ^ Great Lakes Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 294 F.2d 217 (D.C. Cir. 1961).
- ^ "December 4, 1961, Rehearing Denied, No. 318". United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court. 368. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 936. 1962.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 450–455.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 378–382.
- ^ "Quaker City Airways, Inc., d.b.a. Admiral Airways, Inc., Interim Authority". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 37. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 158–169. October 1962 – February 1963. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658610.
- ^ "Paramount Airlines, Inc., Interim Authority". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 37. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 170–177. October 1962 – February 1963. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658610.
- ^ "Trans American Airlines (formerly North American Airlines)". timetableimages.com. Airline Timetable Images. Retrieved 1 November 2024.
- ^ "Safeway Aircoach". timetableimages.com. Airline Timetable Images. Retrieved 1 November 2024.
- ^ "North Star Aircoach". timetableimages.com. Airline Timetable Images. Retrieved 1 November 2024.
- ^ "Skycoach". timetableimages.com. Airline Timetable Images. Retrieved 1 November 2024.
- ^ Aid Mexican Flood Victims, Long Beach (CA) Independent, 29 January 1949
- ^ "Secretary of State Business Search, Record for U.S. Aircoach ID 0211294, View History, Amendment Control ID LBA25045750". bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov. 23 February 1950. Retrieved 25 August 2024.
- ^ "Large Irregular Carriers' Equipment". Aviation Week. 54 (9): 102. 26 February 1951. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ "Board Turns Down U.S. Aircoach". Aviation Week. 54 (12): 66. 19 March 1951. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ ATA Irregular 1954, p. B-62.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 396.
- ^ "U.S. Aircoach and Melvin N. Chapman, Control and Interlocking Relationships". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 27. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 243–249. July–November 1958. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657927.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 298,382–384.
- ^ "Large Irregular Air Carrier Investigation". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 29. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 1020–1038. March–September 1959. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360440.
- ^ a b Quarterly Report of Air Carrier Operating Factors (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. March 1955. pp. 70–74. hdl:2027/mdp.39015026081284.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 350–355.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 477–479.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 450–469.
- ^ ATA Irregular 1954, p. B-52.
- ^ CAA Authorizes Airline Name Change, El Paso Times, 27 September 1957
- ^ Purdue 1961, p. 518.
- ^ Suspension Of Airline Is Asked, Miami Herald, 18 March 1959
- ^ Supplement 1961, p. 34.
- ^ a b Handbook of Airline Statistics, United States Certificated Air Carriers, Calendar Years 1949–1956 (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. June 1960. p. 97. hdl:2027/mdp.39015024399167.
- ^ Transcript 1956, p. 44.
- ^ "Aviation Corporation of Seattle, d/b/a Westair Transport". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 13. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 526–527. June 1943 – June 1953. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360614.
- ^ Accident Investigation Report: Aviation Corporation of Seattle (Westair Transport), 300 Miles East of Melbourne, Florida, June 5, 1950 (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. 16 July 1951. Retrieved 25 August 2024.
- ^ "TRANSPORT: Unscheduled Death". Time Magazine. 19 June 1950. Retrieved 25 August 2024.
- ^ "Flying Tiger-Slick Merger Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 18. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 352–353. October 1953 – July 1954. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658420.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 330–333.
- ^ Planned Isle, Alaska Airline Now Defunct, Hawaii Tribune-Herald, 12 February 1960
- ^ "Fate of Nonsked Lines Clouded by Ruling". Aviation Week. 65 (5): 42. 30 July 1956. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 235 F.2d 845 (D.C. Cir. 1956).
- ^ "Large Irregular Air Carrier Investigation". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 28. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 224–502. December 1958 – February 1959. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657877.
- ^ United Air Lines, Inc. v. C.A.B. Board, 278 F.2d 446 (D.C. Cir. 1960).
- ^ Bill Passed to Save Independent Airlines, Albuquerque Journal, 3 July 1960
- ^ a b Air Carrier Analytical Charts and Summaries, Including Supplemental Air Carrier Statistics (Report). Vol. VIII-4. Civil Aeronautics Board. 31 December 1966. p. 35. hdl:2027/osu.32435066764226.
- ^ "Bill Strengthens Control of Supplementals". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 77 (2): 30. 9 July 1962. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ AN ACT, To amend the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, to provide for supplemental air carriers, and for other purposes (PDF) (Pub. L. 87-528). Stat. Vol. 76. 10 July 1962. 143.
- ^ Tax Men Seize Contents Of Air Firm Building, Miami News, 18 February 1954
- ^ Large Irregular, p. 342–343.
- ^ Great Lakes Airlines, Inc. v. C.A.B, 294 F.2d 217 (D.C. Cir. 1961).
- ^ a b Supplement to the Monthly Report of Air Carrier Traffic Statistics (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. 31 December 1961. pp. 23, 27, 34. hdl:2027/mdp.39015022363520.
- ^ "CAB Moves Against 3 Large Nonskeds". Aviation Week. 52 (4): 48. 23 January 1950. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ ATA Irregular 1954, p. B-30.
- ^ "Brief for Respondent". American Airlines, Inc., et. al v. Civil Aeronautics Board & Aircoach Assoc. (D.C. Cir. 1956). 1956. p. 3.
- ^ Accident Investigation Report: Regina Cargo Airlines, Inc., Teterboro, New Jersey, May 27, 1950 (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. 10 April 1951. Retrieved 27 August 2024.
- ^ Accident Investigation Report: Regina Cargo Airlines, Inc. — Near Vail, Washington, September 1, 1953 (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. 22 January 1954. Retrieved 27 August 2024.
- ^ Southeast 1957, p. 99.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 252–253,360,448–450.
- ^ Accident Investigation Report: Imperial Airlines, Inc., Lockheed Constellation L-049, N 2737A, Byrd Field, Richmond, Virginia, November 8, 1961 (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. 6 February 1962. Retrieved 27 August 2024.
- ^ "Imperial Airlines, Dismissal". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 36. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 945–947. April–September 1962. hdl:2027/mdp.39015023950267.
- ^ "Nonsked Prospects Improve Despite Adverse Court Decision". Aviation Week. 66 (8): 145. 25 February 1957. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ The Decline of Supplemental Air Carriers in the United States: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Monopoly of the Select Committee on Small Business, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, Second Session, Part 1: October 6, 7, and 8, 1976 (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1976. pp. 319–327. hdl:2027/pur1.32754078067372.
- ^ Jordan 1976, p. 310.
- ^ "Four U.S. International Airlines Ask Higher Share of MATS Traffic". Aviation Week Including Space Technology. 71 (20): 47. 16 November 1959. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ "MATS Criticized by House Unit". Aviation Week Including Space Technology. 68 (26): 31. 30 June 1958. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ The Role of Military Air Transport Service in Peace and War (Report). United States Department of Defense, Assistant Secretary of Defense (Supply and Logistics). February 1960. pp. 5–6.
- ^ Role 1960, p. 13.
- ^ Jordan 1976, p. 322–324.
- ^ Military Airlift: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Military Airlift, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, Ninety-First Congress, Second Session (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1970. pp. 6310–6312. hdl:2027/uiug.30112119648027.
- ^ Paszyc 1979, p. 56.
- ^ "N123AF McDonnell Douglas DC-8-63CF American Flyers Airline" (photo). airhistory.net. AirHistory.net—The Aviation History Photo Archive. 2 July 1970. Retrieved 13 December 2024.
- ^ "N4908C McDonnell Douglas DC-8-63CF Capitol International Airways" (photo). airhistory.net. AirHistory.net—The Aviation History Photo Archive. 6 September 1970. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
- ^ "N866F McDonnell Douglas DC-8-63CF Overseas National Airways" (photo). airhistory.net. AirHistory.net—The Aviation History Photo Archive. July 1970. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
- ^ "N8956U McDonnell Douglas DC-8-61CF Saturn Airways" (photo). airhistory.net. AirHistory.net—The Aviation History Photo Archive. July 1968. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
- ^ "N8961T McDonnell Douglas DC-8-61CF Trans International Airlines" (photo). airhistory.net. AirHistory.net—The Aviation History Photo Archive. 21 June 1969. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
- ^ "N804U McDonnell Douglas DC-8-61CF Universal Airlines" (photo). airhistory.net. AirHistory.net—The Aviation History Photo Archive. 12 April 1971. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
- ^ "N802WA McDonnell Douglas DC-8-63CF World Airways" (photo). airhistory.net. AirHistory.net—The Aviation History Photo Archive. 19 June 1971. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
- ^ "CAB Considers Plan to Revive Standard". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 91 (8): 46. 25 August 1969. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ Jordan 1976, p. 327.
- ^ Miami Airline Owner Killed As Plane Falls in Swamp, Miami Herald, 17 November 1958
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 327–328.
- ^ "Argonaut Airways Corporation, Interim Operating Authority". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 36. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 823–827. April–September 1962. hdl:2027/mdp.39015023950267.
- ^ a b "Supplemental Air Service Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 45. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 231–424. July–November 1966. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658214.
- ^ "Saturn-AAXICO Merger Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 43. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 150–173. July 1965 – January 1966. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658313.
- ^ "Reopened Supplemental Air Service Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 47. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 601. July–December 1967. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658115.
- ^ a b "Transatlantic Cargo Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 21. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 671–759. June–October 1955. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360531.
- ^ a b Quarterly Report of Air Carrier Financial Statistics (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. March 1956. pp. 52–55. hdl:2027/mdp.39015026081276.
- ^ a b Analytical 1966, p. 31.
- ^ a b "Zantop Air Transport, Inc., and Coastal Air Lines, Certificate Transfer". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 36. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 139–168. April–September 1962. hdl:2027/uc1.b2938527.
- ^ a b "Vance Roberts, d.b.a. Northwest Air Service, Operating Authority For Supplemental Air Service". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 32. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 89–136. October 1960 – January 1961. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360416.
- ^ a b "Purdue Aeronautics Corporation Interim Operating Authority". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 33. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 508–528. February–May 1961. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657570.
- ^ a b "Service to Puerto Rico Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 26. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 72–164. October 1957 – June 1958. hdl:2027/uc1.b2938517.
- ^ Proceeding 1966, p. 397–398.
- ^ a b "Demand, Jets, New Authority Spur Growth". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 90 (10): 40. 28 August 1967. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ "MATS Fiscal 1962 Airline Contracts". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 74 (24): 37. 12 June 1961. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ "Military Charter Cost Analysis". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 85 (6): 45. 8 August 1966. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Air Carrier Analytical Charts and Summaries, Including Supplemental Air Carrier Statistics (Report). Vol. VIII-4. Civil Aeronautics Board. 31 December 1966. p. 31. hdl:2027/osu.32435066764226.
- ^ Quarterly Report of Air Carrier Financial Statistics (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. March 1958. p. 79. hdl:2027/mdp.39015026081490.
- ^ Quarterly Report of Air Carrier Financial Statistics (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. March 1959. p. 76. hdl:2027/mdp.39015026081490.
- ^ Quarterly Report of Air Carrier Financial Statistics (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. March 1960. p. 79. hdl:2027/mdp.39015026081482.
- ^ Quarterly Report of Air Carrier Financial Statistics (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. March 1961. p. 85. hdl:2027/mdp.39015026081482.
- ^ Proceedings 1966, p. 386.
- ^ a b Pathwick-Paszyc, John-Conrad (December 1979). Acquisition of Airlift Services From Commercial Sources: A Revised Method (Masters thesis). Naval Postgraduate School. p. 44. hdl:10945/18583.
- ^ Pan American World Airways, Annual Report 1968. digitalcollections.library.miami.edu/digital/collection/asm0341 (Report). Pan American World Airways. 1968. p. 11,20. Retrieved 19 December 2024.
- ^ Hearings 1970, p. 6333.
- ^ "U.S. Airlift Capacity Slated To Climb 400% in 6 Years". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 86 (10): 81. 6 March 1967. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Paszyc 1979, p. 43,45.
- ^ Haanappel, Peter P.C. (1978). Ratemaking in International Air Transport. Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer. pp. 133–134. ISBN 978-90-268-0979-8.
- ^ Keyes, Lucille S. (1973). "The Translantic (sic) Charter Policy of the United States". Journal of Air Law and Commerce. 39 (2): 215–248.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link) - ^ "Business: Exodus 1971: New Bargains in the Sky". Time Magazine. 19 July 1971.
- ^ Koffler, Warren W. (1966). "IATA, Its Legal Structure—A Critical Review". Journal of Air Law and Commerce. 32 (2): 222–235.
- ^ IATA Struggles For Survival As Cartel Role Is Diminished, Washington Post, 7 April 1979
- ^ Haanappel 1978, p. 44.
- ^ Haanappel 1978, p. 9.
- ^ Haanappel 1978, p. 153–154.
- ^ a b Haanappel 1978, p. 2.
- ^ a b Haanappel 1978, p. 106.
- ^ Pillai, K.G.J. (1969). The Air Net. New York: Grossman Publishers. pp. xvi–xvii. LCCN 77088566.
- ^ Haanappel 1978, p. 6.
- ^ Keyes 1973, p. 231.
- ^ "Germany Plans to Restrict U.S. Affinity Unit Charters". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 85 (15): 23. 16 February 1970. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ a b Case 1972, p. 341.
- ^ "Reopened Transatlantic Charter Investigation". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 45. Washington, DC: U.S. General Printing Office: 441–481. July–November 1966. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658214.
- ^ 442 F.2d 862 Transcript 1970, p. 114.
- ^ Transcript of Record: National Air Carrier Association v. C.A.B, 442 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1971), Appendix. Washington, DC: Thiel Press. 1970. p. 124.
- ^ "'Survival' Is Issue In Clash Over Bulk Fares". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 92 (10): 179. 9 March 1970. ISSN 0005-2175.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Hearings 1974, p. 181.
- ^ "Transatlantic Route Proceeding and Supplemental Renewal Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 72. Washington, DC: U.S. General Printing Office: 309. December 1976 – February 1977. hdl:2027/mdp.39015023949558.
- ^ "Universal Airlines, Acquisition of American Flyers". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 58. Washington, DC: U.S. General Printing Office: 1–48. September 1971 – February 1972. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657562.
- ^ "Transatlantic Supplemental Charter Authority Renewal Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 59. Washington, DC: U.S. General Printing Office: 280–360. March–July 1972. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657513.
- ^ Jordan 1976, p. 329–334.
- ^ haanappel 1978, p. 115.
- ^ Reamey, Gerald S. (1976). "Charter Air Travel: Paper Airplanes in a Dogfight". Journal of Air Law and Commerce. 42 (2): 406–408.
- ^ "Supplementals Get Atlantic Charter Rights". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 80 (10): 31. 9 March 1964. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ Keyes 1973, p. 224.
- ^ Practices2 1975, p. 952.
- ^ a b c LMRecent 1979, p. 483.
- ^ Kamp, Jaap (1975). "The Near Failure of Air Charter Regulation: The Case for More Experimentation in Public Policy". Journal of Air Law and Commerce. 41 (3): 400.
- ^ a b Practices2 1975, p. 962.
- ^ Keyes 1973, p. 226.
- ^ Lowenfeld, Andreas F.; Mendelsohn, Allan I. (1979). "Economics, Policy and Law: Recent Developments in the World of International Air Charters". Journal of Air Law and Commerce. 44 (3): 497.
- ^ a b "Airlines Join to Fight Illegal Charters". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 91 (5): 41. 4 August 1969. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ Reamey 1976, p. 420.
- ^ Haanappel 1978, p. 115.
- ^ Oversight of Civil Aeronautics Board Practices and Procedures: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Administrative Practice and Procedure of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-Fourth Congress, First Session (Report). Vol. 2. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1975. p. 1287. hdl:2027/uiug.30112106910083.
- ^ Practices2 1975, p. 939–940.
- ^ Practices2 1975, p. 943,959.
- ^ Practices2 1975, p. 958.
- ^ Practices2 1975, p. 955–957,979–981.
- ^ CABReport 1975, p. 18.
- ^ Practices1 1975, p. 565–566.
- ^ Air Transport 1971 (PDF) (Report). Washington, DC: Air Transport Association of America. p. 4. Retrieved 24 December 2024.
- ^ Air Transport 1975 (PDF) (Report). Washington, DC: Air Transport Association of America. pp. 1, 5. Retrieved 24 December 2024.
- ^ Civil Aeronautics Board Practices and Procedures: Report of the Subcommittee on Administrative Practice and Procedure of the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States Senate (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. pp. 84–87. hdl:2027/mdp.39015078076794.
- ^ CABReport 1975, p. 12–15.
- ^ "Timm to Push Industry Economic Vitality". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 98 (10): 30. 5 March 1973. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ "Timm Sees Airline Profits Spread, with 12% Average". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 98 (21): 23. 21 May 1973. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ CABReport 1975, p. 11.
- ^ CABReport 1975, p. 15.
- ^ Report 1974, p. 4–9.
- ^ "AIRLINES: Can Pan American Survive". Time Magazine. 20 May 1974.
- ^ Practices2 1975, p. 1283.
- ^ Report 1974, p. 10.
- ^ Airline Charter Fares: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Administrative Practice and Procedure of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-third Congress, Second Session (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. hdl:2027/mdp.39015078640482.
- ^ Procedures Relating To Minimum Charter Air Fares: Staff Report to the Subcommittee on Administrative Practice and Procedure of the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States Senate (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. hdl:2027/mdp.39015077942012.
- ^ CABReport 1975, p. 23.
- ^ Kamp 1975, p. 408.
- ^ "Junketeering". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 101 (4): 11. 29 July 1974. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ "Cost-Cutting". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 102 (1): 11. 6 January 1975. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ "CAB Withdraws Guidelines on Transatlantic Charter Rates". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 102 (7): 29. 6 January 1975. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ Bay Man Sees Death, Terror At Airfield Oakland Tribune, 30 March 1975
- ^ How Ed Daly Got The Orphans Out Oakland Tribune, 17 April 1975
- ^ Hearings 1970, p. 6334.
- ^ "New Charter Rule Meets Mixed Reaction". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 103 (7): 24. 8 August 1975. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ "Washington Roundup: Flexibility Flaunted". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 105 (10): 27. 6 September 1976. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ Benefits Outweight Drawbacks in Charter Flights, St Louis Post-Dispatch, 16 January 1977
- ^ Report singles out tourism potential, Honolulu Star-Advertiser, 24 May 1977
- ^ Charter Air Travel Up Anaheim (CA) Bulletin, 7 March 1977
- ^ 1977: The Charter Revolution Is at Hand, 2 January 1977
- ^ A year for charters Boston Globe, 6 March 1977
- ^ Petzinger, Thomas (1996). Hard Landing: The Epic Contest For Power and Profits That Plunged the Airlines into Chaos. Random House. p. 75. ISBN 9780307774491.
- ^ Oversight of Civil Aeronautics Board Practices and Procedures: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Administrative Practice and Procedure of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-Fourth Congress, First Session (Report). Vol. 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1975. p. 67. hdl:2027/uiug.30112106910083.
- ^ Air-fare competition is spelling disaster for charter tours Louisville (KY) Courier-Journal, 28 August 1977
- ^ "Laker Seeks to Allay Early Concerns". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 107 (14): 28. 3 October 1977. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ £32 Fares to New York in 'Skytrain' Plan, Daily Telegraph, 1 July 1971
- ^ "Super Apex Negotiations Seen Dominating IATA Conference". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 107 (14): 29. 3 October 1977. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ International Air Transportation Competition Act of 1978: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Aviation of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, Ninety-Fifth Congress, Second Session, on S. 3363 (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1978. p. 95. hdl:2027/mdp.39015076086985.
- ^ Benelux 1978, p. 915.
- ^ LMRecent 1979, p. 484–486,499.
- ^ LMRecent 1979, p. 493–494.
- ^ "United States-Benelux Pendente Lite Exemptions". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 78. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 907–929. August–September 1978. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657497.
- ^ "Vienna Rights". Aviation Week & Space Technology. 109 (21): 43. 20 November 1978. ISSN 0005-2175.
- ^ LMRecent 1979, p. 499.
- ^ Bailey, Elizabeth E.; Graham, David R.; Kaplan, Daniel P. (May 1983). Deregulating the Airlines: An Economic Analysis (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. pp. 34–36. hdl:2027/ien.35556021337282.
- ^ Supplement to the Handbook of Airline Statistics: Calendar Years 1977 and 1978 (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. November 1979. hdl:2027/osu.32435025695669.
- ^ Supplement to the Handbook of Airline Statistics: Calendar Years 1975 and 1976 (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. December 1977. hdl:2027/uc1.31822008525891.
- ^ Air Carrier Financial Statistics (Report). Washington, DC: Civil Aeronautics Board. March 1981. p. Insert cover page. hdl:2027/msu.31293024880605.
- ^ CABReport 1975, p. 40–58.
- ^ "Charter Flights". transportation.gov. U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved 24 December 2024.
- ^ "Air Carrier Summary : T1: U.S. Air Carrier Traffic And Capacity Summary by Service Class". transtats.bts.gov. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved 24 December 2024.
- ^ Caves, Richard E. (1962). Air Transport and its Regulators. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 200. LCCN 62017216.
- ^ Caves 1962, p. 178.
- ^ Civil Aeronautics Board Reports to Congress 1968 (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 9 December 1968. p. 160. hdl:2027/pst.000067708055.
- ^ "Catalina Air Transport Route Abandonment". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 21. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 827–829. June–October 1955. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360531.
- ^ Civil Aeronautics Board Reports to Congress 1968 (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 9 December 1968. p. 161. hdl:2027/pst.000067708055.
- ^ "Pan American-UMCA Acquisition Case, UMCA Abandonment Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 29. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 392–395. March–September 1959. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360440.
- ^ "Florida Airways, Inc., Certificate Extension". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 10. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 93–99. January–November 1949. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657588.
- ^ "Mid-West Certificate Renewal Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 15: 424–462. January–June 1952. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360598.
- ^ "Wiggins Renewal Investigation Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 16: 483–533. July 1952 – February 1953. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658529.
- ^ 9 Lost in Lake Erie Crash, New York Times, January 29, 1970
- ^ "Reopened TAG-Wright Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 58. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 525–544. September 1971 – February 1972. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657562.
- ^ a b "Part I. Statistical Description of the Individual United States Airlines". Supplement to the Handbook of Airline Statistics: Calendar Years 1977 and 1978 (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. November 1979. p. 73. hdl:2027/osu.32435025695669.
- ^ Handbook 1979, p. 41.
- ^ Handbook 1979, p. 56–57.
- ^ Handbook 1979, p. 48.
- ^ Annual Report: Fiscal Year 1977 and Transitional Quarter (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. May 1978. p. 155. hdl:2027/pst.000067708109.
- ^ Air Carrier Financial Statistics (Report). Civil Aeronautics Board. December 1979. pp. 91–93. hdl:2027/osu.32435022510978.
- ^ Endres, Günter G. (1979). World Airline Fleets 1979. Hounslow (UK): Airline Publications and Sales. pp. 214–215. ISBN 0905117530.
- ^ Endres 1979, p. 230–231.
- ^ Endres 1979, p. 245.
- ^ Endres 1979, p. 254.
- ^ Endres 1979, p. 264.
- ^ Endres 1979, p. 273.
- ^ Endres 1979, p. 280–281.
- ^ Endres 1979, p. 298.
- ^ Endres 1979, p. 296–297.
- ^ "St Louis Limited Supplemental Air Service Investigation". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 49. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 565–578. August–December 1968. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658016.
- ^ "Interstate Airmotive, Inc., Fitness Criteria". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 60. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 760–766. August–December 1972. hdl:2027/mdp.39015007658480.
- ^ "Transatlantic Route Proceeding and Supplemental Renewal Proceeding". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 72. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 216–482. December 1976 – February 1977. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657752.
- ^ a b "DOD Contract-Eligible Certification Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 74. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 139–168. July–September 1977. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657653.
- ^ Large Irregular 1959, p. 284,335–339.
- ^ Hawaiian Airline v. Trans-Pacific Airlines, 73 F.Supp. 68 (D. Haw. 1947).
- ^ "Hawaii Intraterritorial Service". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 10. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 62–92. January–November 1949. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657588.
- ^ "Skycruise Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 10. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 393–398. January–November 1949. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657588.
- ^ "Air Freight Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 10. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 572–646. January–November 1949. hdl:2027/osu.32437011657588.
- ^ Air Freight 1949, p. 646.
- ^ "Airnews, Inc., Route Abandonment". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 14. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 1193–1194. May–December 1951. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360606.
- ^ "Additional Service to Puerto Rico Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 12. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 430–492. September 1950 – April 1951. hdl:2027/osu.32435067593848.
- ^ "Airlift International, Inc., Name Change". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 40. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 815–816. March–July 1964. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658461.
- ^ "Latin American Air Freight Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 16. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 107–201. July 1952 – February 1953. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360580.
- ^ "North-South Airfreight Renewal Case". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 22. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 253–321. November–December 1955. hdl:2027/osu.32435022360515.
- ^ "AAXICO Airlines, Inc., Interim Certificate". Civil Aeronautics Board Reports. 37. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office: 110–119. October 1962 – February 1963. hdl:2027/osu.32437011658610.