Jump to content

Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) is a United States law that requires all food labels in the United States to list ingredients that may cause allergic reactions and was effective as of January 1, 2006.[1][2] While many ingredients can trigger a food allergy, this legislation only specifies the eight major food allergens. This law was passed largely due to the efforts of organizations such as the Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network (FAAN).

The purpose of this act was to prevent manufacturers from using misleading, uncommon, or confusing methods to label their ingredients.[3] Someone shopping for a friend with a soy allergy might not know that lecithin is derived from soy. Now it must be labeled "lecithin (soy)" to help prevent consumers from consuming allergens.

Eight "major" food allergens

[edit]

This law is in regard to the eight most common food allergens.[4] These affect the most people and the proteins are commonly found in other ingredients. They account for about 90% of food allergies.[5] The main eight are:

Any ingredient which contains proteins derived from these allergens must also be listed.[6] The specific type of nut, fish, or shellfish must be listed (e.g., walnut, catfish, blue crab).[7] Even minute amounts, such as coloring or spices, must be listed if they contain any proteins from these major allergens.[8]

Manufacturers are given two ways in which to label food allergens. They may either state the food source name of a major food allergen in the list of ingredients, most often contained within parenthesis. (e.g. Casein (milk)) or they could instead use the word "contains" in the label, such as "contains peanuts".[2]

They can choose either method, as long as it is clearly written. If they choose the second method and say an ingredient "contains" the allergen, they must be sure to list all allergens contained, such as by saying "contains pecans and soy".

Sesame

[edit]

On April 23, 2021, the Food Allergy Safety, Treatment, Education, and Research (FASTER) Act added sesame as the ninth major allergen; the law took effect January of 2023.[9] The law backfired as major commercial bakers, unable to ensure their products contained no sesame, began adding sesame to their recipes.[10][11]

Some bakeries, including Bimbo Bakeries, which makes Sara Lee, Entenmann's and Ball Park brands, attempted to comply with the law by listing sesame as an ingredient, even though it was not; the FDA said federal regulations forbid including sesame in the list of ingredients unless it is intentionally added.[12][13] The FDA typically requests recall of products containing unintended allergens.[9][10][11][14]

Many commercial bakers found adding sesame to the recipes was the only feasible way to comply.[10][11][9] As a result consumers have reported the availability of safe products has diminished profoundly.[11][9]

Manufacturers introducing sesame into recipes that previously didn't include sesame include store brands Wegmans, Kroger, Walmart, and Target, brands Wonder, Thomas’, and Dave's Killer Bread, and restaurants Jack in the Box, Sonic, Chick-fil-A and Wendy's.[11][9] Olive Garden announced the chain is adding “a minimal amount of sesame flour” to their breadsticks recipe “due to the potential for cross-contamination at the bakery.”[10] United States Bakery announced it would add a small amount of sesame flour to recipes “to mitigate the risk of any adverse reactions to sesame products.”[11] Pan-O-Gold Baking Company, which supplies bread to schools in the US Midwest, added sesame to recipes.[11]

Some restaurants and brands were able to comply with the law without adding sesame to recipes. Jimmy John's removed sesame from its menus. McDonald's did not change its menu or recipes.[9]

The FDA determined manufacturers adding sesame in order to comply with the law were not in violation of the law.[14] Food safety advocacy group Center for Science in the Public Interest petitioned the FDA to stop the new additions, but the FDA denied the request.[14]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Title II, Pub. L. 108–282 (text) (PDF), S. 741, 118 Stat. 905, enacted August 2, 2004
  2. ^ a b Thompson, Tricia; Kane, Rhonda R.; Hager, Mary H. (November 2006). "Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004 in Effect". Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 106 (11): 1742–1744. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2006.08.010. PMID 17081820.
  3. ^ Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004, § 202(4), 118 Stat. 905, 906 (2004), (available at https://www.fda.gov/food/food-allergensgluten-free-guidance-documents-regulatory-information/food-allergen-labeling-and-consumer-protection-act-2004-falcpa).
  4. ^ 21 U.S.C. § 321 (qq) (available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/321).
  5. ^ Public Law. "Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act". FARE. Archived from the original on 29 June 2014. Retrieved 3 July 2013.
  6. ^ Bren, Linda (March–April 2006). "Food Labels Identify Allergens More Clearly". FDA Consumer. 40.2 (37–8).
  7. ^ "FAQ About the Food Labeling Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA)". Kids With Food Allergies. Retrieved 3 July 2013.
  8. ^ "Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act". FARE. Retrieved 2 July 2013.
  9. ^ a b c d e f Weese, Karen (11 April 2023). "To comply with a new sesame allergy law, some businesses add — sesame". The Washington Post.
  10. ^ a b c d Aubrey, Allison (30 August 2023). "A sesame allergy law has made it harder to avoid the seed. Here's why". NPR.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g Aleccia, Jonel (2022-12-21). "New label law has unintended effect: Sesame in more foods". AP News. Retrieved 2024-12-22.
  12. ^ "FDA warns top U.S. bakery not to claim foods contain allergens when they don't". NPR. 26 June 2024.
  13. ^ "Bakery That Makes Sara Lee and Entenmann's Pushes Back on FDA Sesame Warning". US News & World Report. 9 October 2024.
  14. ^ a b c Aleccia, Jonel (26 July 2023). "Sesame is being newly added to some foods. The FDA says it doesn't violate an allergy law". The Hill.
  • H. Lemon-Mule, T.J. Furlong,S.H. Sicherer. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Volume 119, Issue 1, Supplement, January 2007, Pages S74.
[edit]