Draft talk:Chariot Energy

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Business

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles

Need Help on Article Before Submitting for Review

Hello there, I would like to request some help in improving my article "Draft:Chariot Energy" before submitting for review completely. This article is intended to be completely informational and neutral on the company, Chariot Energy. Edgar at ChariotEnergy (talk) 15:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Edgar at ChariotEnergy: Your article is overly reliant on primary sources. To establish that this company is notable enough for inclusion, you need to show evidence of extensive coverage from reliable sources that are independent of the company itself. The company's own press releases (or websites that repeat company-authored materials) won't count towards establishing notability. Trade publications are also not considered high-quality sources, due to the fact that they are geared towards promoting a company's work. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello thank you for your feedback. I've gone in and re-adjusted some of those sources, making the article less reliant on press release sources. I've also removed some paragraphs and sentences that would likely not have a suitable source to back up that claim. Does this new, edited version of the article look good to publish for review? Edgar at ChariotEnergy (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]