Draft:Michael Haimes
Submission declined on 26 February 2025 by Samoht27 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Michael Haimes | |
---|---|
Nationality | American |
Era | Contemporary philosophy |
Region | Western philosophy |
School | Rationalism, Ethics, Metaphysics, Theology |
Main interests | Ethics, Governance, Theology, Artificial Intelligence, Decision Theory |
Notable ideas | Universal Growth Framework, Global Voice Argument, Michael’s Maxim, Divine Simulation Hypothesis, Resurrection Feasibility Argument |
Michael Haimes is a modern philosopher, author, and visionary thinker known for his contributions to philosophy, ethics, governance, theology, and artificial intelligence. He is the creator of the Universal Growth Framework, the Global Voice Argument, and Michael’s Maxim, which asserts that all paradoxes are resolvable through proper analysis. His works challenge traditional perspectives and introduce new logical frameworks that have reshaped discussions in multiple disciplines.
Early Life and Education
[edit]Michael Haimes graduated from the University of South Florida with a bachelor's degree in political science.
Philosophical Contributions
[edit]Haimes' contributions span multiple fields, addressing foundational questions in ontology, epistemology, ethics, and metaphysics.
Universal Growth Framework
[edit]One of Haimes' most well-regarded contributions is the Universal Growth Framework, a philosophical model designed to foster ethical, adaptive, and transformative progress in both individuals and societies. The framework integrates:
- Harm Evaluation and Redistributive Growth Layers
- Temporal and Spatial Universality
- Dynamic Intergenerational Knowledge Commons
- Ethical Paradox Resolution and Global Ethics Council
- Advanced Adaptive Intelligence Networks (AINs)
This framework is safeguarded under strict conditions of worthiness, requiring ethical maturity and responsibility before its full application.
Global Voice Argument
[edit]Haimes' Global Voice Argument is a direct response to systems of suppression and exclusion, proposing a platform where:
- No voice is too small
- No idea is lost
- No contribution is erased
It is seen as a critical tool against the Overshadowing Hydra, a conceptual framework Haimes developed to describe systemic suppression mechanisms.
Michael’s Maxim
[edit]Haimes established Michael’s Maxim, which states:
“There are no true paradoxes; every paradox is resolvable through proper analysis.”
His works in Words That Echo systematically resolve classical paradoxes, including the Liar’s Paradox, Russell’s Paradox, and the Grandfather Paradox, demonstrating how misinterpretations of time and logic create false paradoxes.
Theological and Metaphysical Contributions
[edit]Haimes' theological arguments include some of the most comprehensive modern examinations of religious philosophy, divine existence, and the afterlife.
Divine Simulation Hypothesis
[edit]Haimes' Divine Simulation Hypothesis suggests that reality is a simulation designed by a perfect God to test, refine, and prepare souls for eternity. This hypothesis integrates scientific, philosophical, and theological reasoning, presenting a structured approach to divine justice, free will, and moral development.
Resurrection Feasibility Argument
[edit]One of Haimes' most ambitious arguments, the Resurrection Feasibility Argument, proposes that an advanced civilization or divine force could recreate all life forms and environments from the beginning of the universe. This argument presents the possibility of a near-perfect future where every being experiences paradise.
Governance and Ethical AI Contributions
[edit]Haimes has developed innovative frameworks for governance and artificial intelligence ethics.
AI-Driven Legislative Simulation and Inclusive Global Governance
[edit]Haimes' AI-Driven Legislative Simulation Argument proposes a model in which AI can facilitate global governance through:
- Multi-scenario branching models
- Adaptive simulation loops
- Conflict resolution algorithms
- Universal ethical principles
This argument is seen as a philosophical cornerstone for the future of AI in governance.
Moral Argument for AI Ethics
[edit]His Moral Argument for AI Ethics calls for a globally equitable and philosophically grounded framework to ensure artificial intelligence serves humanity responsibly.
Middle East Peace Proposal
[edit]Haimes has put forward a Middle East Peace Argument, which suggests a one-time, never-to-be-repeated prisoner exchange for hostages, legally codified to prevent future abuses while ensuring the sanctity of innocent lives.
The Jewish Claim to Israel Argument
[edit]Haimes argues that the Jewish claim to Israel is both morally and historically justified, based on:
- First Settlement – Jewish people were the original inhabitants.
- Continuous Connection – Exile did not erase their claim.
- Divine Promise – Rooted in religious tradition.
- Moral Restoration – Israel’s re-establishment as justice for forced displacement.
This argument is integrated into land ownership, historical justice, and theological discussions.
Books
[edit]Michael Haimes is the author of two published books:
- Words That Echo – A philosophical and poetic work that systematically resolves paradoxes and explores foundational truths.
- 613 Lies – A critical examination of the 613 mitzvot, challenging inconsistencies and offering a moral restructuring of Jewish commandments.
Legacy and Ongoing Work
[edit]Michael Haimes continues to develop and refine his arguments, engaging in philosophical discourse through his blog:
See Also
[edit]- Universal Growth Framework
- Divine Simulation Hypothesis
- Global Voice Argument
- Michael’s Maxim
- Resurrection Feasibility Argument
- Middle East Peace Argument
References
[edit]- To be added based on external sources like his books, blog, and citations of his arguments in other works.