Draft:Hidoc Dr
Submission declined on 25 January 2025 by RangersRus (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 15 January 2025 by KylieTastic (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 10 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 9 January 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 17 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 30 December 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Bonadea 26 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 12 December 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 45 days ago.
| |
Comment: Pick a topic, either the company or the person. Also for either they require significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability KylieTastic (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Not one of the sources cited contributes anything towards notability per WP:NCORP. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:54, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Still no independent sources. bonadea contributions talk 15:25, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Press releases and (other) primary sources contribute nothing towards notability per WP:NCORP. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
 | This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by Kuru (talk | contribs) 2 seconds ago. (Update)
Finished drafting? or |
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Hidoc Dr. is an AI-powered healthcare platform designed for medical education, doctor networking, and healthcare delivery.[citation needed] The platform offers a range of services, including medical second opinions, access to more than 30,000 medical journals, 1 million medical cases, webinars, learning series, and advanced diagnostic tools[1][dead link]. It serves as a resource for doctors across various specialties, empowering them with the latest medical knowledge and AI-driven insights.
References
[edit]- ^ "Hidoc Dr". pmjay.gov.in. Retrieved 2025-01-15.
This page will be placed in the following categories if it is moved to the article namespace.
Categories:
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.