Category talk:Technicolor SA
Appearance
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Opposed speedy move request
[edit]- Category:Technicolor SA to Category:Technicolor Creative Studios – With the renaming of Technicolor SA into Vantiva, the title of the category page of Technicolor should be simplified and also will be as the center category of its current parent company, Technicolor Creative Studios. Ridwan97 (talk) 09:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Ridwan97, the article Technicolor is about the technology, not the company so C2D does not apply. TSventon (talk) 19:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Reply TSventon better to change to "Technicolor Creative Studios"? Will be work. The article of the company also SHOULD available on Wikipedia. That's it.Ridwan97 (talk) 22:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ridwan97, C2D needs to be based on an existing article and Technicolor Creative Studios doesn't exist yet. TSventon (talk) 22:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- TSventon Technicolor Creative Studios is ACTUALLY exists and why don't you make the article about it? hahahahaha. Visit www.technicolorcreative.com for more details.Ridwan97 (talk) 22:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ridwan97, I think that the category should be renamed Category:Vantiva in line with Vantiva. If Category:Technicolor Creative Studios is needed, a new category could be created. TSventon (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- TSventon Vantiva does not need the category page, cause it does not have any specific article about its products, even not handling the RCA and Thomson brands anymore since it was sold to Talisman Brands.Ridwan97 (talk) 14:07, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Ridwan97, the article Technicolor is about the technology, not the company so C2D does not apply. TSventon (talk) 19:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC)