Category talk:Redirects to stub templates

This category was nominated for renaming on 18 February 2022. The result of the discussion was Rename.

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of redirects and their categorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects.
This banner is not designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and almost never on the talk pages of mainspace redirects. For more information see the template documentation.RedirectWikipedia:WikiProject RedirectTemplate:WikiProject Redirectredirect

Templates

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Templates, a group dedicated to improving the maintenance of Wikipedia's templates. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TemplatesWikipedia:WikiProject TemplatesTemplate:WikiProject TemplatesTemplates

Stub sorting

This category is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting

Redirect links to this category?

So many pages, including this category which is supposed to replace it, still link to the "historical" Stub redirects page:

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Stub_redirects

These links should either be removed or replaced with links to the appropriate location, which if I understand correctly is this category.

Sorry all I can do is point this out at the moment! I'll try to follow up in a better location soon but my real-life limitations might not let me. Thanks in advance! —Geekdiva (talk) 11:17, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your concerns, Geekdiva! The page you link to is, as you know, being kept for historical reference. Since this category page references that page, and since that page has at least two links to this category, one at the very top and one in the side-navbar, I'm not sure why you seem to want to bypass that historical reference? Paine Ellsworth ^put'r there 09:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]