Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Merge
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Merge and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 91.5 days  |
 | This project was initiated as the result of the proposal: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Merge |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
NOTE: To Make a formal Merge Request; please go to the Proposed Article Mergers page
Individual article merge discussions SHOULD NOT be started on this page.
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers/Holding cell
[edit]
Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers/Holding cell, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers/Holding cell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers/Holding cell during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nickps (talk) 12:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- The MFD closed in favour of marking holding cell as historical, so I removed links to Holding cell from existing page instructions and categories.
- The pages I unlinked Holding cell from were - Category:Templates currently being merged, Category:Project pages currently being merged, Category:Pages currently being merged, Category:Articles currently being merged, Wikipedia:Merging, Template:Being merged.
- Some of those, we could edit existing instructions to point to a more relevant category instead of Holding cell. Probably something autogenerated when you put a merge closed/being merged template. Soni (talk) 00:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
"Being" templates is missing a template
[edit]{{being merged}} and {{being split}} is missing an associated template {{being transferred}}. The destination of a split/merge where content is split from one page and moved into another, can use {{being split}} from the source page, but the destination page cannot use {{being merged}} as that template explains the source article would be converted to redirect to it. This wouldn't be the case with a split/merge, where the source page would continue to exist. A relevant target template to explain that a portion of the source page is being merged into the target (template's article subject page, where the transclusion is). -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 03:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
seeking wider input on a potential merge
[edit]Sketchfab into Fab (website) Arlo James Barnes 19:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
merged-from template use
[edit]It seems to me, the purpose of {{afd-merged-from}} is licensing-required attribution of merged content. Is that correct? If then, an AFD was closed as a merger decision, but in the end, nothing was merged but instead merely redirected, is that template still the appropriate one to use? — Fourthords | =Λ= | 21:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)